Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 Nov;20(10):1563-1572.
doi: 10.1002/ejp.885. Epub 2016 Apr 18.

Leisure-time physical activity and sciatica: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Leisure-time physical activity and sciatica: A systematic review and meta-analysis

R Shiri et al. Eur J Pain. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Background and objective: The role of leisure-time physical activity in sciatica is uncertain. This study aimed to assess the association of leisure-time physical activity with lumbar radicular pain and sciatica.

Databases and data treatment: Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar and ResearchGate databases from 1964 through August 2015. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed, and heterogeneity and small-study bias were assessed.

Results: Ten cohort (N = 82,024 participants), four case-control (N = 9350) and four cross-sectional (N = 10,046) studies qualified for meta-analysis. In comparison with no regular physical activity, high level of physical activity (≥4 times/week) was inversely associated with new onset of lumbar radicular pain or sciatica in a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies [risk ratio (RR) = 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-0.99, I2 = 0%, 7 studies, N = 78,065]. The association for moderate level of physical activity (1-3 times/week) was weaker (RR = 0.93, CI 0.82-1.05, I2 = 0%, 6 studies, N = 69,049), and there was no association with physical activity for at least once/week (RR = 0.99, CI 0.86-1.13, 9 studies, N = 73,008). In contrast, a meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies showed a higher prevalence of lumbar radicular pain or sciatica in participants who exercised at least once/week [prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.29, CI 1.09-1.53, I2 = 0%, 4 studies, N = 10,046], or 1-3 times/week (PR = 1.34, CI 1.02-1.77, I2 = 0%, N = 7631) than among inactive participants. There was no evidence of small-study bias.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that moderate to high level of leisure physical activity may have a moderate protective effect against development of lumbar radicular pain. However, a large reduction in risk (>30%) seems unlikely.

What does this review add: Leisure-time physical activity may reduce the risk of developing lumbar radicular pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A meta-analysis of four cross sectional and four case control studies on the association of leisure time physical activity at least once a week vs. no such activity with lumbar radicular pain or sciatica. The size of the gray shaded area indicates the weight of each study. Horizontal lines show the 95% confidence intervals (CI). PR, prevalence ratio; OR, odds ratio.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A meta-analysis of nine prospective cohort studies on the association of leisure time physical activity at least once a week vs. no such activity with lumbar radicular pain or sciatica. The size of the gray shaded area indicates the weight of each study. Horizontal lines show the 95% confidence intervals (CI). RR, risk ratio.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A meta-analysis of six prospective cohort studies on the association of moderate level of leisure time physical activity vs. no leisure-time physical activity with lumbar radicular pain or sciatica. The size of the gray shaded area indicates the weight of each study. Horizontal lines show the 95% confidence intervals (CI). RR, risk ratio.
Figure 4
Figure 4
A meta-analysis of seven prospective cohort studies on the association of high level of leisure time physical activity vs. no leisure time physical activity with lumbar radicular pain or clinically verified sciatica. The size of the gray shaded area indicates the weight of each study. Horizontal lines show the 95% confidence intervals (CI). RR, risk ratio.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Armijo-Olivo S, Stiles CR, Hagen NA, Biondo PD, Cummings GG. Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18:12–18. - PubMed
    1. Bakker EW, Verhagen AP, van Trijffel E, Lucas C, Koes BW. Spinal mechanical load as a risk factor for low back pain: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:E281–293. - PubMed
    1. Borenstein M, Hedges L, Higgins J, Rothstein H. Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; New York: 2009.
    1. Bruunsgaard H. Physical activity and modulation of systemic low-level inflammation. J Leukoc Biol. 2005;78:819–835. - PubMed
    1. Chen SM, Liu MF, Cook J, Bass S, Lo SK. Sedentary lifestyle as a risk factor for low back pain: a systematic review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2009;82:797–806. - PubMed