Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jun;117(7):1099-109.
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcw061. Epub 2016 Apr 18.

Plant defences on land and in water: why are they so different?

Affiliations
Review

Plant defences on land and in water: why are they so different?

Geerat J Vermeij. Ann Bot. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Plants (attached photosynthesizing organisms) are eaten by a wide variety of herbivorous animals. Despite a vast literature on plant defence, contrasting patterns of antiherbivore adaptation among marine, freshwater and land plants have been little noticed, documented or understood.

Scope: Here I show how the surrounding medium (water or air) affects not only the plants themselves, but also the sensory and locomotor capacities of herbivores and their predators, and I discuss patterns of defence and host specialization of plants and herbivores on land and in water. I analysed the literature on herbivory with special reference to mechanical defences and sensory cues emitted by plants. Spines, hairs, asymmetrically oriented features on plant surfaces, and visual and olfactory signals that confuse or repel herbivores are common in land plants but rare or absent in water-dwelling plants. Small terrestrial herbivores are more often host-specific than their aquatic counterparts. I propose that patterns of selection on terrestrial herbivores and plants differ from those on aquatic species. Land plants must often attract animal dispersers and pollinators that, like their herbivorous counterparts, require sophisticated locomotor and sensory abilities. Plants counter their attractiveness to animal helpers by evolving effective contact defences and long-distance cues that mislead or warn herbivores. The locomotor and sensory world of small aquatic herbivores is more limited. These characteristics result from the lower viscosity and density of air compared with water as well as from limitations on plant physiology and signal transmission in water. Evolutionary innovations have not eliminated the contrasts in the conditions of life between water and land.

Conclusion: Plant defence can be understood fully when herbivores and their victims are considered in the broader context of other interactions among coexisting species and of the medium in which these interactions occur.

Keywords: Sexual selection; animal guards; defence; freshwater; herbivory; marine; specialization; spines; terrestrial; trichomes; visual signal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abbott IA, Hollenberg GJ. 1976. Marine algae of California. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    1. Agrawal AA, Weber MD. 2015. On the study of plant defence and herbivory using comparative approaches: how important are plant secondary compounds? Ecology Letters 18: 985–991. - PubMed
    1. Aldea C, Valdovinos C. 2005. Moluscos del intermareal rocoso del centro-sur de Chile (360 a 380 S): taxonomía y clave de identificación. Gayana 69: 364–396.
    1. Anderson LM, Martone PT. 2014. Biomechanical consequences of epiphytism in intertidal macroalgae. Journal of Experimental Biology 217: 1167–1174. - PubMed
    1. Appeltans W, Ahyong ST, Anderson G. et al. 2012. The magnitude of global marine species diversity. Current Biology 22: 2189–2202. - PubMed