Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2016 Apr 18;6(4):e011207.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011207.

Methodological issues in the design and evaluation of supported communication for aphasia training: a cluster-controlled feasibility study

Simon Horton  1 , Allan Clark  2 , Garry Barton  2 , Kathleen Lane  1 , Valerie M Pomeroy  1
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Methodological issues in the design and evaluation of supported communication for aphasia training: a cluster-controlled feasibility study

Simon Horton et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess the feasibility and acceptability of training stroke service staff to provide supported communication for people with moderate-severe aphasia in the acute phase; assess the suitability of outcome measures; collect data to inform sample size and Health Economic evaluation in a definitive trial.

Design: Phase II cluster-controlled, observer-blinded feasibility study.

Settings: In-patient stroke rehabilitation units in the UK matched for bed numbers and staffing were assigned to control and intervention conditions.

Participants: 70 stroke rehabilitation staff from all professional groups, excluding doctors, were recruited. 20 patients with moderate-severe aphasia were recruited.

Intervention: Supported communication for aphasia training, adapted to the stroke unit context versus usual care. Training was supplemented by a staff learning log, refresher sessions and provision of communication resources.

Main outcome measures: Feasibility of recruitment and acceptability of the intervention and of measures required to assess outcomes and Health Economic evaluation in a definitive trial. Staff outcomes: Measure of Support in Conversation; patient outcomes: Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale; Communicative Access Measure for Stroke; Therapy Outcome Measures for aphasia; EQ-5D-3L was used to assess health outcomes.

Results: Feasibility of staff recruitment was demonstrated. Training in the intervention was carried out with 28 staff and was found to be acceptable in qualitative reports. 20 patients consented to take part, 6 withdrew. 18 underwent all measures at baseline; 16 at discharge; and 14 at 6-month follow-up. Of 175 patients screened 71% were deemed to be ineligible, either lacking capacity or too unwell to participate. Poor completion rates impacted on assessment of patient outcomes. We were able to collect sufficient data at baseline, discharge and follow-up for economic evaluation.

Conclusions: The feasibility study informed components of the intervention and implementation in day-to-day practice. Modifications to the design are needed before a definitive cluster-randomised trial can be undertaken.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN37002304; Results.

Keywords: REHABILITATION MEDICINE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT flow diagram of the trial conduct. CAMS3, Communicative Access Measure for Stroke; HSU Q; Health Services Use Questionnaire, SAQOL, Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Townsend N, Wickramasinghe K, Bhatnagar P et al. . Coronary heart disease statistics 2012 edition. London: British Heart Foundation, 2012.
    1. Department of Health. National stroke strategy. London: Department of Health, 2007.
    1. O'Halloran R, Worrall L, Hickson L. Environmental factors that influence communication between patients and their healthcare providers in acute hospital stroke units: an observational study. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2011;46:30–47. - PubMed
    1. Simmons Mackie NN, Kagan A, O'Neill Christie C et al. . Communicative access and decision making for people with aphasia: implementing sustainable healthcare systems change. Aphasiology 2007;21:9–66. 10.1080/02687030600798162 - DOI
    1. Hemsley B, Werninck M, Worrall L. “That really shouldn't have happened”: people with aphasia and their spouses narrate adverse events in hospital. Aphasiology 2013;27:706–22. 10.1080/02687038.2012.748181 - DOI

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources