Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2016 Jun 9;127(23):2833-40.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-01-694604. Epub 2016 Apr 18.

Randomized phase 2 study: elotuzumab plus bortezomib/dexamethasone vs bortezomib/dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory MM

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Randomized phase 2 study: elotuzumab plus bortezomib/dexamethasone vs bortezomib/dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory MM

Andrzej Jakubowiak et al. Blood. .

Abstract

In this proof-of-concept, open-label, phase 2 study, patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) received elotuzumab with bortezomib and dexamethasone (EBd) or bortezomib and dexamethasone (Bd) until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary/exploratory endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Two-sided 0.30 significance level was specified (80% power, 103 events) to detect hazard ratio (HR) of 0.69. Efficacy and safety analyses were performed on all randomized patients and all treated patients, respectively. Of 152 randomized patients (77 EBd, 75 Bd), 150 were treated (75 EBd, 75 Bd). PFS was greater with EBd vs Bd (HR, 0.72; 70% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.88; stratified log-rank P = .09); median PFS was longer with EBd (9.7 months) vs Bd (6.9 months). In an updated analysis, EBd-treated patients homozygous for the high-affinity FcγRIIIa allele had median PFS of 22.3 months vs 9.8 months in EBd-treated patients homozygous for the low-affinity allele. ORR was 66% (EBd) vs 63% (Bd). Very good partial response or better occurred in 36% of patients (EBd) vs 27% (Bd). Early OS results, based on 40 deaths, revealed an HR of 0.61 (70% CI, 0.43-0.85). To date, 60 deaths have occurred (28 EBd, 32 Bd). No additional clinically significant adverse events occurred with EBd vs Bd. Grade 1/2 infusion reaction rate was low (5% EBd) and mitigated with premedication. In patients with RRMM, elotuzumab, an immunostimulatory antibody, appears to provide clinical benefit without added clinically significant toxicity when combined with Bd vs Bd alone. Registered to ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01478048.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Survival rates. (A) PFS (primary definition) and (B) OS. Data cutoff: September 12, 2014.
Figure 2
Figure 2
PFS (primary definition): subgroup analysis. FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; ISS, International Staging System; NA, not available; PI, proteasome inhibitor. Data cutoff: September 12, 2014.
Figure 3
Figure 3
PFS (primary definition) in FcγRIIIa high-affinity (VV) and low-affinity (FF) subgroups. Data are based on all randomized patients with FcγRIIIa genotypes being homozygous VV or FF. Data cutoff: August 10, 2015.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Peripheral blood natural killer cell counts/percentage (all treated patients). Baseline natural killer cell values are reported on cycle 1 day 1 (C1D1). C2D1, cycle 2 day 1; EOT, end of treatment (discontinuation of elotuzumab). Whiskers, confidence intervals; middle line in box, median; upper and lower limit of box, range; circles, outliers.

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(1):5–29. - PubMed
    1. Smith BD, Smith GL, Hurria A, Hortobagyi GN, Buchholz TA. Future of cancer incidence in the United States: burdens upon an aging, changing nation. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(17):2758–2765. - PubMed
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines for Treatment of Cancer by Site: Multiple Myeloma. Version 2.2016, September 22, 2015. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp. Accessed December 15, 2015.
    1. Antonia SJ, Larkin J, Ascierto PA. Immuno-oncology combinations: a review of clinical experience and future prospects. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(24):6258–6268. - PubMed
    1. Ascierto PA, Marincola FM. What have we learned from cancer immunotherapy in the last 3 years? J Transl Med. 2014;12:141. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data