Influence of primary and secondary prevention indications on anxiety about the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
- PMID: 27092190
- PMCID: PMC4823574
- DOI: 10.1016/j.joa.2015.10.002
Influence of primary and secondary prevention indications on anxiety about the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
Abstract
Background: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have been established for primary and secondary prevention of fatal arrhythmias. However, little is known about the influence of ICD indications on quality of life (QOL) and psychological disturbances. This study aimed to examine whether there were differences in QOL and psychological distress in patients that have an ICD for primary or secondary prevention of fatal arrhythmias.
Methods: A multicenter survey of 179 consecutive outpatients (29.1% primary prevention) with ICD implantations completed the Short Form-8 (SF-8), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and Worries about ICD (WAICD).
Results: Patients with an ICD for primary prevention had a higher trait anxiety score and worries about ICD score than patients with an ICD for secondary prevention (41.7±12.4 vs. 34.7±12.3, p=0.001 and 39.6±18.0 vs. 30.0±18.9, p=0.002, respectively), even after adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics. In multivariable analysis of variance, primary prevention ICD recipients reported a poorer QOL on the vitality subscale of the SF-8.
Conclusions: In our study population, which mostly consisted of New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I and II subjects, primary prevention ICD recipients were more prone to experience worries about their ICD, anxiety, and a poorer QOL compared to secondary prevention ICD recipients. In clinical practice, primary prevention ICD patients should be closely monitored. If warranted, they should be offered psychological intervention, as anxiety and low QOL were predictors of mortality.
Keywords: Anxiety; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Primary prevention; Quality of life; Secondary prevention.
Figures

References
-
- Zipes D.P., Camm A.J., Borggrefe M. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for practice guidelines (writing committee to develop guidelines for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death): developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2006;114:e385–e484. - PubMed
-
- Epstein A.E., DiMarco J.P., Ellenbogen K.A. ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (writing committee to revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 guideline update for implantation of cardiac pacemakers and antiarrhythmia devices) developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:e1–62. - PubMed
-
- Dunbar S.B. Psychosocial issues of patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Am J Crit Care. 2005;14:294–303. - PubMed
-
- Sola C.L., Bostwick J.M. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, induced anxiety, and quality of life. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80:232–237. - PubMed
-
- Bilge A.K., Ozben B., Demircan S. Depression and anxiety status of patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator and precipitating factors. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006;29:619–626. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources