Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Winter;10(1):17-22.
doi: 10.15171/joddd.2016.003. Epub 2016 Mar 16.

Sealing of adhesive systems in ferric sulfate-contaminated dentinal margins in class V composite resin restorations

Affiliations

Sealing of adhesive systems in ferric sulfate-contaminated dentinal margins in class V composite resin restorations

Niloofar Shadman et al. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2016 Winter.

Abstract

Background. Hemostatic agents are applied to prepare an isolated bleeding-free condition during dental treatments and can influence adhesive restorations. This study evaluated the effect of a hemostatic agent (ViscoStat) on microleakage of contaminated dentinal margin of class V composite resin restorations with three adhesives. Methods. Sixty freshly extracted human molars were selected and class V cavities (3×3×1.5 mm) were prepared on buccal and lingual surfaces. Gingival margins of the cavities were placed below the cementoenamel junction. The teeth were divided into six groups randomly. The adhesives were Excite, AdheSE and AdheSE One. In three groups, the gingival walls of the cavities were contaminated with ViscoStat and then rinsed. The cavities were restored with composite resin and light-cured. After storage in distilled water (37°C) for 24 hours and polishing, the samples were thermocycled and sealed with nail varnish. Then they were stored in 1% basic fuchsin for 24 hours, rinsed and mounted in self-cured acryl resin, followed by sectioning buccolingually. Dye penetration was observed under a stereomicroscope and scored. Data were statistically analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. P<0.05 was set as the level of significance. Results. Only in the Excite group, contamination did not have adverse effects on dentin microleakage (P > 0.05). In the contaminated groups, Excite had significantly less microleakage than the others (P = 0.003). AdheSE and AdheSE One did not exhibit significant difference in microleakage (P > 0.05). Conclusion. ViscoStat hemostatic agent increased dentinal microleakage in AdheSE and AdheSE One adhesives with no effect on Excite.

Keywords: Adhesive; composite restoration; hemostatic agent; microleakage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ernst CP, Cortain G, Spohn M, Rippin G, Willershausen G. Marginal integrity of different resin-based composites for posterior teeth: an in vitro dye-penetration study on eight resin-composite and compomer-/adhesive combinations with a particular look at the additional use of flow-composites. Dent Mater. 2002;18:351–8. - PubMed
    1. Murray PE, Hafez AA, Smith AJ, Cox CF. Bacterial microleakage and pulp inflammation associated with various restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2002;18:470–8. - PubMed
    1. Fischer D. Tissue management needs for adhesive dentistry a self now and in the future. J Esthetic Dent. 1998;42:596–606. - PubMed
    1. Bowles WH, Tardy SJ, Vahidi A. Evaluation of new gingival retraction agents. J Dent Res. 1991;70:1447–9. - PubMed
    1. Hormati AA, Fuller JL, Denehy GE. Effects of contamination and mechanical disturbance on the quality of acid etched enamel. J Am Dent Assoc. 1980;100:34–8. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources