Comparison of Audiological Results Between a Transcutaneous and a Percutaneous Bone Conduction Instrument in Conductive Hearing Loss
- PMID: 27093021
- DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001010
Comparison of Audiological Results Between a Transcutaneous and a Percutaneous Bone Conduction Instrument in Conductive Hearing Loss
Abstract
Objectives: In conductive, mixed hearing losses and single-sided-deafness bone-anchored hearing aids are a well-established treatment. The transcutaneous transmission across the intact skin avoids the percutaneous abutment of a bone-anchored device with the usual risk of infections and requires less care.In this study, the audiological results of the Bonebridge transcutaneous bone conduction implant (MED-EL) are compared to the generally used percutaneous device BP100 (Cochlear Ltd., Sydney, Australia).
Methods: Ten patients implanted with the transcutaneous hearing implant were compared to 10 matched patients implanted with a percutaneous device. Tests included pure-tone AC and BC thresholds and unaided and aided sound field thresholds. Speech intelligibility was determined in quiet using the Freiburg monosyllable test and in noise with the Oldenburg sentence test (OLSA) in sound field with speech from the front (S0). The subjective benefit was assessed with the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit.
Results: In comparison with the unaided condition there was a significant improvement in aided thresholds, word recognition scores (WRS), and speech reception thresholds (SRT) in noise, measured in sound field, for both devices. The comparison of the two devices revealed a minor but not significant difference in functional gain (Bonebridge: PTA = 27.5 dB [mean]; BAHA: PTA = 26.3 dB [mean]). No significant difference between the two devices was found when comparing the improvement in WRSs and SRTs (Bonebridge: improvement WRS = 80% [median], improvement SRT = 6.5 dB SNR [median]; BAHA: improvement WRS = 77.5% [median], BAHA: improvement SRT = 6.9 dB SNR [median]).
Conclusion: Our data show that the transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant is an audiologically equivalent alternative to percutaneous bone-anchored devices in conductive hearing loss with a minor sensorineural hearing loss component.
Similar articles
-
Improvement of speech perception in quiet and in noise without decreasing localization abilities with the bone conduction device Bonebridge.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 May;274(5):2107-2115. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4434-2. Epub 2016 Dec 28. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017. PMID: 28032241
-
Objective and subjective results of the Bonebridge transcutaneous active direct-drive bone conduction hearing implant.Saudi Med J. 2019 Aug;40(8):797-801. doi: 10.15537/smj.2019.8.24383. Saudi Med J. 2019. PMID: 31423516 Free PMC article.
-
Audiological Results in SSD With an Active Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant at a Retrosigmoidal Position.Otol Neurotol. 2017 Jun;38(5):642-647. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001394. Otol Neurotol. 2017. PMID: 28375939
-
Multicentric study on surgical information and early safety and performance results with the Bonebridge BCI 602: an active transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Apr;280(4):1565-1579. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07792-y. Epub 2023 Jan 10. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023. PMID: 36625869 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Implantable Devices for Single-Sided Deafness and Conductive or Mixed Hearing Loss: A Health Technology Assessment.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020 Mar 6;20(1):1-165. eCollection 2020. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020. PMID: 32194878 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Long-term audiological benefit with an active transcutaneous bone-conduction device: a retrospective cohort analysis.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Jul;279(7):3309-3326. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-07031-w. Epub 2021 Aug 23. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022. PMID: 34424382
-
The middle fossa approach with self-drilling screws: a novel technique for BONEBRIDGE implantation.J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Jul 29;48(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s40463-019-0354-7. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019. PMID: 31358057 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-reported long-term benefit with an active transcutaneous bone-conduction device.PLoS One. 2020 Nov 2;15(11):e0241247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241247. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 33137128 Free PMC article.
-
Long-Term Follow-Up in Active Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implants.Otol Neurotol. 2024 Jan 1;45(1):58-64. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004057. Epub 2023 Nov 26. Otol Neurotol. 2024. PMID: 38085764 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical and functional results after implantation of the bonebridge, a semi-implantable, active transcutaneous bone conduction device, in children and adults.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Jan;279(1):101-113. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06626-7. Epub 2021 Mar 6. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022. PMID: 33674927 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous