Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr 19;6(4):e787.
doi: 10.1038/tp.2016.48.

Reduced habituation of auditory evoked potentials indicate cortical hyper-excitability in Fragile X Syndrome

Affiliations

Reduced habituation of auditory evoked potentials indicate cortical hyper-excitability in Fragile X Syndrome

L E Ethridge et al. Transl Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Sensory hypersensitivities are common, clinically distressing features of Fragile X Syndrome (FXS). Preclinical evidence suggests this abnormality may result from synaptic hyper-excitability in sensory systems. This model predicts reduced sensory habituation to repeated stimulus presentation. Fourteen adolescents and adults with FXS and 15 age-matched controls participated in a modified auditory gating task using trains of 4 identical tones during dense array electroencephalography (EEG). Event-related potential and single trial time-frequency analyses revealed decreased habituation of the N1 event-related potential response in FXS, and increased gamma power coupled with decreases in gamma phase-locking during the early-stimulus registration period. EEG abnormalities in FXS were associated with parent reports of heightened sensory sensitivities and social communication deficits. Reduced habituation and altered gamma power and phase-locking to auditory cues demonstrated here in FXS patients parallels preclinical findings with Fmr1 KO mice. Thus, the EEG abnormalities seen in FXS patients support the model of neocortical hyper-excitability in FXS, and may provide useful translational biomarkers for evaluating novel treatment strategies targeting its neural substrate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

JAS served as a consultant to Takeda, Roche and Lilly. MJB reports research grant funding and speaker's bureau support from Otsuka. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ERP grand average PCA-weighted virtual channel plot for FXS and matched controls, with inset PCA spatial component topography. Small black bars indicate presentation of the auditory stimulus. ERP, event-related potential; FXS, Fragile X Syndrome; PCA, principal components analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) ITC. (b) Single trial power. (c) Baseline-corrected single trial power. Black boxes in the difference maps indicate clusters with significant group differences. Warmer colors in the difference maps (right column) indicate higher phase-locking or higher power for FXS and cooler colors indicate higher values for healthy controls. FXS, Fragile X Syndrome; ITC, inter-trial coherence.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relationship of excitatory (gamma single trial power, N1 amplitude to initial stimulus) and inhibitory (gamma phase-locking during ‘gamma spike' for initial stimulus and first repetition) activity in response to trains of auditory stimuli. Units for both x and y axes represent averaged rank scores from lowest (1) to highest (29) for the composite variables. Controls show high inhibitory, organized activity and low background excitatory noise. In contrast, most FXS participants have both higher excitatory response and lower inhibitory activity. FXS, Fragile X Syndrome.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chonchaiya W, Schneider A, Hagerman RJ. Fragile X: a family of disorders. Adv Pediatr 2009; 56: 165–186. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hagerman PJ. The fragile X prevalence paradox. J Med Genet 2008; 45: 498–499. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Matsuzaki J, Kagitani-Shimono K, Goto T, Sanefuji W, Yamamoto T, Sakai S et al. Differential responses of primary auditory cortex in autistic spectrum disorder with auditory hypersensitivity. Neuroreport 2012; 23: 113–118. - PubMed
    1. Hall SS, Walter E, Sherman E, Hoeft F, Reiss AL. The neural basis of auditory temporal discrimination in girls with fragile X syndrome. J Neurodev Disord 2009; 1: 91–99. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gibson JR, Bartley AF, Hays SA, Huber KM. Imbalance of neocortical excitation and inhibition and altered UP states reflect network hyperexcitability in the mouse model of fragile X syndrome. J Neurophysiol 2008; 100: 2615–2626. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types