Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug;215(2):206.e1-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.008. Epub 2016 Apr 16.

Host response to synthetic mesh in women with mesh complications

Affiliations

Host response to synthetic mesh in women with mesh complications

Alexis L Nolfi et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Despite good anatomic and functional outcomes, urogynecologic polypropylene meshes that are used to treat pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence are associated with significant complications, most commonly mesh exposure and pain. Few studies have been performed that specifically focus on the host response to urogynecologic meshes. The macrophage has long been known to be the key cell type that mediates the foreign body response. Conceptually, macrophages that respond to a foreign body can be dichotomized broadly into M1 proinflammatory and M2 proremodeling subtypes. A prolonged M1 response is thought to result in chronic inflammation and the formation of foreign body giant cells with potential for ongoing tissue damage and destruction. Although a limited M2 predominant response is favorable for tissue integration and ingrowth, excessive M2 activity can lead to accelerated fibrillar matrix deposition and result in fibrosis and encapsulation of the mesh.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to define and compare the macrophage response in patients who undergo mesh excision surgery for the indication of pain vs a mesh exposure.

Study design: Patients who were scheduled to undergo a surgical excision of mesh for pain or exposure at Magee-Womens Hospital were offered enrollment. Twenty-seven mesh-vagina complexes that were removed for the primary complaint of a mesh exposure (n = 15) vs pain in the absence of an exposure (n = 12) were compared with 30 full-thickness vaginal biopsy specimens from women who underwent benign gynecologic surgery without mesh. Macrophage M1 proinflammatory vs M2 proremodeling phenotypes were examined via immunofluorescent labeling for cell surface markers CD86 (M1) vs CD206 (M2) and M1 vs M2 cytokines via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The amount of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) proteolytic enzymes were quantified by zymography and substrate degradation assays, as an indication of tissue matrix degradation. Statistics were performed with the use of 1-way analysis of variance with appropriate post hoc tests, t-tests, and Fisher's Exact test.

Results: Twenty-seven mesh-vaginal tissue complexes were excised from 27 different women with mesh complications: 15 incontinence mid urethral slings and 12 prolapse meshes. On histologic examination, macrophages surrounded each mesh fiber in both groups, with predominance of the M1 subtype. M1 and M2 cytokines/chemokines, MMP-9 (pro- and active), and MMP-2 (active) were increased significantly in mesh-vagina explants, as compared with vagina without mesh. Mesh explants that were removed for exposure had 88.4% higher pro-MMP-9 (P = .035) than those removed for pain. A positive correlation was observed between the profibrotic cytokine interleukin-10 and the percentage of M2 cells (r = 0.697; P = .037) in the pain group.

Conclusion: In women with complications, mesh induces a proinflammatory response that persists years after implantation. The increase in MMP-9 in mesh explants that were removed for exposure indicates degradation; the positive association between interleukin-10 and M2 macrophages in mesh explants that are removed for pain is consistent with fibrosis.

Keywords: cytokine; inflammatory response; macrophage phenotype; polypropylene mesh.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

P.A.M. and S.D.A. have cooperative research agreements with ACell, Columbia, MD; the other authors report no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE
FIGURE
Immunofluorescent labeling of pan-macrophage marker CD68 (red), M1 proinflammatory marker CD86 (orange), M2 proremodeling macrophage marker CD206 (green), and 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (blue). A, A mesh-tissue section from a patient with an exposure who had been implanted with the AMS Perigee prolapse mesh (American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, MN) for 93 months; B, a mesh-tissue section from a patient with pain who had been implanted with the Gynecare TVT Secur (Ethion, Inc., Somerville, NJ) for 6 months; C, control tissue from patients without graft implantation. An asterisk indicates a predominance of proinflammatory M1 macrophages surround mesh fibers that is consistent with a prolonged immune response could be observed in both A and B; however, this response is limited to the area immediately adjacent to mesh fibers. Control tissue contained few or no macrophages as compared with mesh patient tissue. Original magnification ×200. Nolfi et al. Vaginal macrophage profile in women with mesh complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016.

References

    1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. [Accessed May 24, 2016];UPDATE on Serious Complications Associated with Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: FDA Safety Communication. 2011 Jul 13; Available at: www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm262435.htm.
    1. Cervigni M, Natale F. The use of synthetics in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Curr Opin Urol. 2001;11:429–435. - PubMed
    1. Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Muller M, Schumpelick V. Foreign body reaction to meshes used for the repair of abdominal wall hernias. Eur J Surg. 1999;165:665–673. - PubMed
    1. Cobb WS, Kercher KW, Heniford BT. The argument for lightweight polypropylene mesh in hernia repair. Surg Innov. 2005;12:63–69. - PubMed
    1. Pierce LM, Rao A, Baumann SS, Glassberg JE, Kuehl TJ, Muir TW. Long-term histologic response to synthetic and biologic graft materials implanted in the vagina and abdomen of a rabbit model. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:546.e1–546.e8. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances