Non-Islanded Distally Based Sural Artery Flap : A Reliable Solution for an Unreliable Flap
- PMID: 27097704
Non-Islanded Distally Based Sural Artery Flap : A Reliable Solution for an Unreliable Flap
Abstract
Objective: To assess the reliability of non-islanded distally based sural artery flap, in terms of number of flap failure (partial and major flap necrosis), number of surgeries related to the problem for which flap surgery was performed, hospital stay and return to work, for coverage of soft tissue defects of the distal one-third of leg, ankle and heel.
Study design: Cohort study.
Place and duration of study: Department of Plastic Surgery and Burn Unit, Mayo Hospital, KEMU, Lahore, Pakistan, from January 2003 to March 2014.
Methodology: Distally based sural artery flaps in 87 patients requiring coverage of distal lower lumb were studied, retrospectively. They were divided into two groups. G1 included 46 cases in which distally based sural artery flap was islanded. G2 included 41 cases in which flap was not islanded and pedicle was raised. The variables that were measured in two groups included age, gender, size and cause of defect, co-morbidities, number of surgeries, total hospital stay, return to work and flap related complications. Independent sample t-test and tests of proportions were used for comparison with significance at p < 0.05.
Results: The mean age of patients was 38.4 ±16.2 years in G1 and 35.1 ±18.6 years in G2. In G1, 34 cases were traumatic, 5 caused by diabetic ulcers and another 7 cases were trophic ulcers in paraplegic patients caused by pressure sores. In G2, the cause was trauma in 32 cases, diabetic ulcers in 7 cases, trophic ulcers in 2 cases. The mean number of surgeries in G1 was 3 ±1 and 2 ±1 in G2 (p < 0.001). The mean hospital stay in G1 was 43.1 ±3.6 days while 27.9 ±2.1 days in G2 (p < 0.001). There was epidermolysis in 21 out of 46 islanded distally based sural artery flaps (G1) and in 9 out of 41 non-islanded flaps (G2) (p=0.0203). Partial necrosis occurred in 12 of flaps in G1 and in only 3 of G2 flaps (p=0.024).
Conclusion: Distally based sural artery flap can be made more reliable and with lesser complications by raising the pedicle with skin rather than islanding the flap.
Similar articles
-
Versatility of the sural fasciocutaneous flap in the coverage of lower third leg and hind foot defects.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59(8):839-45. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2005.12.009. Epub 2006 Mar 9. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006. PMID: 16876082
-
The distally based sural flap for lower leg reconstruction: versatility in patients with associated morbidity.Ann Ital Chir. 2007 Jul-Aug;78(4):323-7. Ann Ital Chir. 2007. PMID: 17990610
-
Extended Islanded Reverse Sural Artery flap for Staged Reconstruction of Foot Defects Proximal to Toes.J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2018 Feb;28(2):126-128. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2018.02.126. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2018. PMID: 29394972
-
The distally based sural flap.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 May;119(6):138e-148e. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000259203.79909.7e. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007. PMID: 17440334 Review.
-
The distally based peroneus brevis muscle flap-clinical series and review of the literature.Microsurgery. 2014 Mar;34(3):203-8. doi: 10.1002/micr.22172. Epub 2013 Sep 30. Microsurgery. 2014. PMID: 24123085 Review.
Cited by
-
Distally based peroneal artery perforator-plus fasciocutaneous flap in the reconstruction of soft tissue defects over the distal forefoot: a retrospectively analyzed clinical trial.J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Oct 21;15(1):487. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02019-4. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020. PMID: 33087146 Free PMC article.
-
Reverse Flow Superficial Sural Artery Fasciocutaneous Flap: A Comparison of Outcome between Interpolated Flap Design versus Islanded Flap Design.World J Plast Surg. 2019 Sep;8(3):316-323. doi: 10.29252/wjps.8.3.316. World J Plast Surg. 2019. PMID: 31620333 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Research Materials