Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jun;30(3):195-206.
doi: 10.1007/s40259-016-0174-5.

Assessing the Immunogenicity of Biopharmaceuticals

Affiliations
Review

Assessing the Immunogenicity of Biopharmaceuticals

Carlos Pineda et al. BioDrugs. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Biopharmaceuticals have the potential to raise an immunogenic response in treated individuals, which may impact the efficacy and safety profile of these drugs. As a result, it is essential to evaluate immunogenicity throughout the different phases of the clinical development of a biopharmaceutical, including post-marketing surveillance. Although rigorous evaluation of biopharmaceutical immunogenicity is required by regulatory authorities, there is a lack of uniform standards for the type, quantity, and quality of evidence, and for guidance on experimental design for immunogenicity assays or criteria to compare immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals. Moreover, substantial technological advances in methods to assess immune responses have yielded higher immunogenicity rates with modern assays, and limit comparison of immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals outside of head-to-head clinical trials. Accordingly, research programs, regulatory agencies, and clinicians need to keep pace with continuously evolving analyses of immunogenicity. Here, we review factors associated with immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals, potential clinical ramifications, and current regulatory guidance for evaluating immunogenicity, and discuss methods to assess immunogenicity in non-clinical and clinical studies. We also describe special considerations for evaluating the immunogenicity of biosimilar candidates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Stepwise approach to assessing immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals. ADA anti-drug antibody
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Evolution of immunogenicity assays for biopharmaceuticals and assessment of anti-adalimumab antibodies (reprinted from van Leeuwen et al. [43], © 2015, with permission from Elsevier and adapted from Thermo Fisher Scientific [Carlsbad, CA, USA]). ADA anti-drug antibody, ADL adalimumab, ARIA acid-dissociation radioimmunoassay, ECL electrochemiluminescence, ELISA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, PIA pH-shift anti-idiotype antigen-binding test, TRIA temperature-shift radioimmunoassay
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
One-assay versus two-assay approach for anti-drug antibody screening of biosimilars. ADAs anti-drug antibodies

References

    1. Morrow T, Felcone LH. Defining the difference: what makes bologics unique. Biotechnol Healthc. 2004;1(4):24–29. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walsh G. Biopharmaceutical benchmarks 2010. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28(9):917–924. doi: 10.1038/nbt0910-917. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang J, Chow SC. On the regulatory approval pathway of biosimilar products. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2012;5(4):353–368. doi: 10.3390/ph5040353. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bennett CL, Chen B, Hermanson T, Wyatt MD, Schulz RM, Georgantopoulos P, et al. Regulatory and clinical considerations for biosimilar oncology drugs. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(13):e594–e605. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70365-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. Scientific considerations in demonstrating biosimilarity to a reference product: guidance for industry. SIlver Spring: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER); 2015 (last update Apr 2015). http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformati.... Accessed 23 Mar 2015.

MeSH terms