What Can We Do to Optimize Colonoscopy and How Effective Can We Be?
- PMID: 27098814
- DOI: 10.1007/s11894-016-0500-6
What Can We Do to Optimize Colonoscopy and How Effective Can We Be?
Abstract
In the USA, colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer and third leading cause of cancer death among both men and women. Declining rates of colon cancer in the past decade have been attributed in part to screening and removal of precancerous polyps via colonoscopy. Recent emphasis has been placed on measures to increase the quality and effectiveness of colonoscopy. These have been divided into pre-procedure quality metrics (bowel preparation), procedural quality metrics (cecal intubation, withdrawal time, and adenoma detection rate), post-procedure metrics (surveillance interval), and other quality metrics (patient satisfaction and willingness to repeat the procedure). The purpose of this article is to review the data and controversies surrounding each of these and identify ways to optimize the performance of colonoscopy.
Keywords: Adenoma detection rate; Bowel prep; Colonoscopy.
Similar articles
-
Colonoscopy quality assessment.Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2015 Apr;25(2):373-86. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2014.11.008. Epub 2015 Jan 2. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2015. PMID: 25839691 Review.
-
Increased adenoma detection rate with system-wide implementation of a split-dose preparation for colonoscopy.Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Sep;76(3):603-8.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.04.456. Epub 2012 Jun 23. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012. PMID: 22732876
-
Colonoscopy quality measures: experience from the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.Gut. 2012 Jul;61(7):1050-7. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300651. Epub 2011 Sep 22. Gut. 2012. PMID: 21940723
-
Rates of Suboptimal Preparation for Colonoscopy Differ Markedly Between Providers: Impact on Adenoma Detection Rates.J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Oct;49(9):746-50. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000210. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 25144900
-
Quality in Colonoscopy.Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2015 Oct;17(10):461. doi: 10.1007/s11894-015-0461-1. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2015. PMID: 26292664 Review.
Cited by
-
A short telephone-call reminder improves bowel preparation, quality indicators and patient satisfaction with first colonoscopy.Endosc Int Open. 2017 Dec;5(12):E1172-E1178. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-117954. Epub 2017 Nov 21. Endosc Int Open. 2017. PMID: 29202000 Free PMC article.
-
Predictive factors for missed adenoma on repeat colonoscopy in patients with suboptimal bowel preparation on initial colonoscopy: A KASID multicenter study.PLoS One. 2018 Apr 26;13(4):e0195709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195709. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29698398 Free PMC article.
-
Adenoma miss rate of polypectomy-referring hospitals is high in Korea.Korean J Intern Med. 2020 Jul;35(4):881-888. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2018.099. Epub 2019 Oct 17. Korean J Intern Med. 2020. PMID: 31610632 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous