Dexmedetomidine vs propofol-remifentanil conscious sedation for awake craniotomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 27099154
- DOI: 10.1093/bja/aew024
Dexmedetomidine vs propofol-remifentanil conscious sedation for awake craniotomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Awake craniotomy (AC) is performed for the resection of brain tumours in close proximity to areas of eloquent brain function to maximize reduction of tumour mass and minimize neurological injury. This study compares the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine vs propofol-remifentanil-based conscious sedation, during AC for supratentorial tumour resection.
Methods: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial including 50 adult patients undergoing AC who were randomly assigned to a dexmedetomidine (DEX group, n=25) or propofol-remifentanil group (P-R group, n=25). The primary outcome was the ability to perform intraoperative brain mapping assessed on a numeric rating scale (NRS). Secondary outcome was the efficacy of sedation measured by the modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scale. Other outcome measures including haemodynamic and respiratory variables, pain, sedation and anxiety scores, adverse events, and patient satisfaction were also compared.
Results: There were no differences between DEX and P-R groups regarding the ability to perform intraoperative brain mapping [mean NRS score (95% CI): 10.0 (9.9-10.0) vs 9.7 (9.5-10.0), P=0.13] and level of sedation during mapping [mean OAA/S score (95% CI): 4.1 (3.5-4.7) vs 4.3 (3.9-4.7), P=0.51], respectively. Respiratory adverse events were more frequent in the P-R group (20 vs 0%, P=0.021). Heart rate was significantly lower in the DEX group across time (P<0.001); however, the need for treatment of bradycardia was not different between groups.
Conclusions: Quality of intraoperative brain mapping and efficacy of sedation with dexmedetomidine were similar to propofol-remifentanil during AC for supratentorial tumour resection. Dexmedetomidine was associated with fewer respiratory adverse events.
Clinical trial registration: NCT01545297.
Keywords: anaesthetics, intravenous; conscious sedation; craniotomy; dexmedetomidine; propofol; remifentanil.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of dexmedetomidine and propofol for conscious sedation in awake craniotomy: a prospective, double-blind, randomized, and controlled clinical trial.Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Nov;47(11):1391-9. doi: 10.1177/1060028013504082. Epub 2013 Nov 5. Ann Pharmacother. 2013. PMID: 24259599 Clinical Trial.
-
Propofol-dexmedetomidine versus propofol-remifentanil conscious sedation for awake craniotomy during epilepsy surgery.Minerva Anestesiol. 2017 Dec;83(12):1248-1254. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.11873-0. Epub 2017 Jun 14. Minerva Anestesiol. 2017. PMID: 28631453 Clinical Trial.
-
A comparison of propofol vs. dexmedetomidine for sedation, haemodynamic control and satisfaction, during esophagogastroduodenoscopy under conscious sedation.J Clin Pharm Ther. 2015 Aug;40(4):419-25. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12282. Epub 2015 May 13. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2015. PMID: 25970229 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of dexmedetomidine and propofol for sedation in awake craniotomy: A meta-analysis.Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2023 Mar;226:107623. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107623. Epub 2023 Feb 9. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2023. PMID: 36791589 Review.
-
Anesthesia in the patient for awake craniotomy.Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2007 Aug;20(4):331-5. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328136c56f. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2007. PMID: 17620841 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of Intraoperative Dexmedetomidine Infusion on Postoperative Pain after Craniotomy: A Narrative Review.Brain Sci. 2021 Dec 11;11(12):1636. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11121636. Brain Sci. 2021. PMID: 34942938 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Dexmedetomidine: present and future directions.Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019 Aug;72(4):323-330. doi: 10.4097/kja.19259. Epub 2019 Jun 21. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019. PMID: 31220910 Free PMC article. Review.
-
POFA trial study protocol: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled clinical trial comparing opioid-free versus opioid anaesthesia on postoperative opioid-related adverse events after major or intermediate non-cardiac surgery.BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 30;8(6):e020873. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020873. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 29961015 Free PMC article.
-
CYP3A4 gene expression discloses individual differences in postoperative pain susceptibility and drug treatment response in patients with lung cancer.Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2024 Sep 15;17(9):287-297. doi: 10.62347/FPMQ3141. eCollection 2024. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2024. PMID: 39399653 Free PMC article.
-
Median Effective Dose of Dexmedetomidine Inducing Bradycardia in Elderly Patients Determined by Up-and-Down Sequential Allocation Method.Int J Med Sci. 2022 Jun 13;19(6):1065-1071. doi: 10.7150/ijms.71380. eCollection 2022. Int J Med Sci. 2022. PMID: 35813293 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials