Survival analysis in second-line and third-line chemotherapy with irinotecan followed by topotecan or topotecan followed by irinotecan for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer patients: a single-center retrospective study
- PMID: 27099522
- PMCID: PMC4824370
- DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S101390
Survival analysis in second-line and third-line chemotherapy with irinotecan followed by topotecan or topotecan followed by irinotecan for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer patients: a single-center retrospective study
Abstract
Purpose: The number of patients who make it to receive third-line chemotherapy is increasing owing to the improvements in adverse-event management of chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Sequencing of optimal treatment for SCLC is still a challenge for oncologists. In this paper, we aim to present a different approach to the treatment of SCLC.
Methods: Between January 2008 and July 2014, all patients diagnosed with extensive-stage SCLC and treated with third-line chemotherapy at Gaziantep University Oncology Hospital were analyzed retrospectively. Disease control rates and progression-free survival (PFS) for first-, second-, and third-line chemotherapy, and overall survival (OS) were recorded. Survival analysis was calculated by using Kaplan-Meier method.
Results: A total of 255 SCLC patients were screened, and 25 of those patients who received third-line chemotherapy were included in this study. Median age was 57±10.131 years (range: 39-74 years). Disease control rates at first-, second-, and third-line chemotherapy were 92%, 68%, and 44%, respectively. Fourteen patients received irinotecan followed by topotecan, and eleven patients received topotecan followed by irinotecan. Second-line median PFS was statistically better in patients treated with irinotecan at second-line compared with those treated with topotecan (21 vs 12 weeks, P=0.018). Comparison of third-line median PFS of the two groups was not statistically significant (14 vs 12 weeks, P=0.986). Median OS was not statistically significant in patients who received irinotecan followed by topotecan vs those who received topotecan followed by irinotecan (18 vs 14 months, P=0.112).
Conclusion: Sequential monotherapy with topotecan and irinotecan provides a considerable contribution to OS, and second-line irinotecan showed a better PFS, despite a similar OS, compared with topotecan.
Keywords: irinotecan; small-cell lung cancer; third-line chemotherapy; topotecan.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Randomized phase 3 study of the anti-disialoganglioside antibody dinutuximab and irinotecan vs irinotecan or topotecan for second-line treatment of small cell lung cancer.Lung Cancer. 2022 Apr;166:135-142. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.03.003. Epub 2022 Mar 4. Lung Cancer. 2022. PMID: 35278766 Clinical Trial.
-
Combined chemotherapy with cisplatin, etoposide, and irinotecan versus topotecan alone as second-line treatment for patients with sensitive relapsed small-cell lung cancer (JCOG0605): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial.Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):1147-1157. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30104-8. Epub 2016 Jun 14. Lancet Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27312053 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative assessment of three different second-line regimens in chemotherapy resistant / refractory small-cell lung cancer.J BUON. 2021 Jan-Feb;26(1):79-86. J BUON. 2021. PMID: 33721436
-
Comparison of the second-line treatments for patients with small cell lung cancer sensitive to previous platinum-based chemotherapy: A systematic review and Bayesian network analysis.Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 16;13:1154685. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1154685. eCollection 2023. Front Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37007093 Free PMC article.
-
New advances in lung cancer chemotherapy: topotecan and the role of topoisomerase I inhibitors.Oncology. 2001;61 Suppl 1:14-24. doi: 10.1159/000055387. Oncology. 2001. PMID: 11598410 Review.
Cited by
-
Paclitaxel for treatment of advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC): a retrospective study of 185 patients.J Thorac Dis. 2020 Mar;12(3):782-793. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.74. J Thorac Dis. 2020. PMID: 32274145 Free PMC article.
-
Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in small-cell lung cancer: a systematic literature review.J Thorac Dis. 2021 Jun;13(6):3692-3707. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-3034. J Thorac Dis. 2021. PMID: 34277061 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Howlader N, Noonne AM, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2011. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; [Accessed February 22, 2016]. based on November 2013 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2014. Available from: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2011/
-
- Jett JR, Schild SE, Kesler KA, Kalemkerian GP. Treatment of small cell lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013;143:e400S–e419S. - PubMed
-
- Micke P, Faldum A, Metz T, et al. Staging small cell lung cancer: Veterans Administration Lung Study Group versus International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer – what limits limited disease? Lung Cancer. 2002;37:271–276. - PubMed
-
- Johnson BE, Jänne PA. Basic treatment considerations using chemotherapy for patients with small cell lung cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2004;18:309–322. - PubMed
-
- Simon M, Argiris A, Murren JR. Progress in the therapy of small cell lung cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2004;49:119–133. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources