The reliability and validity of the Malay version 17-item Diabetes Distress Scale
- PMID: 27099658
- PMCID: PMC4826578
The reliability and validity of the Malay version 17-item Diabetes Distress Scale
Abstract
Introduction: Diabetes-related distress (DRD) refers to patient's concerns about diabetes mellitus, its management, need of support, emotional burden and access to healthcare. The aim of this study was to translate and examine the psychometric properties of the Malay version of the 17-item Diabetes Distress Scale (MDDS-17) in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D).
Methods: A standard procedure was used to translate the English 17-items Diabetes Distress Scale into Malay language. We used exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with principal axis factoring and promax rotation to investigate the factor structure. We explored reliability by internal consistency and 1-month test-retest reliability. Construct validity was examined using the World Health Organization quality of life-brief questionnaire, Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire and disease-related clinical variables.
Results: A total of 262 patients were included in the analysis with a response rate of 96.7%. A total of 66 patients completed the test-retest after 1 month. EFA supported a three-factor model resulting from the combination of the regimen distress (RD) and interpersonal distress (IPD) subscales; and with a swapping of an item between emotional burden (EB; item 7) and RD (item 3) subscales. Cronbach's α for MDDS-17 was 0.94, the combined RD and IPD subscale was 0.925, the EB subscale was 0.855 and the physician-related distress was 0.823. The test- retest reliability's correlation coefficient was r = 0.29 (n = 66; p = 0.009). There was a significant association between the mean MDDS-17 item score categories (<3 vs ≥3) and HbA1c categories (<7.0% vs ≥7.0%), and medication adherence (medium and high vs ≥low). The instrument discriminated between those having diabetes-related complication, low quality of life, poor medication adherence and depression.
Conclusion: The MDDS-17 has satisfactory psychometric properties. It can be used to map diabetes-related emotional distress for diagnostic or clinical use.
Keywords: Malaysia; Validation; diabetes distress; primary care; type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
The validity and reliability of the English version of the diabetes distress scale for type 2 diabetes patients in Malaysia.BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Feb 20;18(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0601-9. BMC Fam Pract. 2017. PMID: 28219325 Free PMC article.
-
Validity and reliability of a Malay version of the brief illness perception questionnaire for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Aug 3;17(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0394-5. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017. PMID: 28774271 Free PMC article.
-
Validity and reliability of the patient assessment on chronic illness care (PACIC) questionnaire: the Malay version.BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jul 19;19(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0807-5. BMC Fam Pract. 2018. PMID: 30025525 Free PMC article.
-
Psychometric properties of the Thai version of the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale in patients with type 2 diabetes.Ann Pharmacother. 2009 May;43(5):950-7. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L453. Epub 2009 Apr 14. Ann Pharmacother. 2009. PMID: 19366872
-
[Caregiver burden in relatives of persons with schizophrenia: an overview of measure instruments].Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):137-47. Encephale. 2003. PMID: 14567165 Review. French.
Cited by
-
The Chinese version of the revised Diabetes Distress Scale for adults with type 2 diabetes: Translation and validation study.Int J Nurs Sci. 2022 Mar 8;9(2):243-251. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2022.03.002. eCollection 2022 Apr. Int J Nurs Sci. 2022. PMID: 35509697 Free PMC article.
-
The Development and Validation of Quality of Life Scale for Iraqi Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2020 Jul-Sep;12(3):262-268. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_190_19. Epub 2020 Jul 18. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2020. PMID: 33100785 Free PMC article.
-
Psychometric validation of diabetes distress scale in Bangladeshi population.Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 12;12(1):562. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04671-0. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35022493 Free PMC article.
-
Distress and depression among patients with diabetes mellitus: prevalence and associated factors: a cross-sectional study.J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2021 Jan 18;20(1):141-151. doi: 10.1007/s40200-020-00721-y. eCollection 2021 Jun. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2021. PMID: 34178826 Free PMC article.
-
The validity and reliability of the English version of the diabetes distress scale for type 2 diabetes patients in Malaysia.BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Feb 20;18(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0601-9. BMC Fam Pract. 2017. PMID: 28219325 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Earles J. et al. Assessing psychosocial distress in diabetes: Development of the diabetes distress scale. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:626–31. - PubMed
-
- Nicolucci A, Kovacs Burns K, Holt RI. et al. For the DAWN2 study group. Diabetes Attitudes, wishes and needs second study (DAWN2TM): Cross-national benchmarking of diabetes-related psychosocial outcomes for people with diabetes. Diabet Med. 2013;30(7):767–77. - PubMed
-
- Berry E, Lockhart S, Davies M. et al. Diabetes distress: Understanding the hidden struggles of living with diabetes and exploring intervention strategies. Postgrad Med J. 2015 [Epub ahead of print] - PubMed
-
- Ogbera A, Adeyemi-Doro A. Emotional distress is associated with poor self care in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes. 2011;3:348–52. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous