Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Aug 31;10(2):22-35.
eCollection 2015.

The reliability and validity of the Malay version 17-item Diabetes Distress Scale

Affiliations

The reliability and validity of the Malay version 17-item Diabetes Distress Scale

B H Chew et al. Malays Fam Physician. .

Abstract

Introduction: Diabetes-related distress (DRD) refers to patient's concerns about diabetes mellitus, its management, need of support, emotional burden and access to healthcare. The aim of this study was to translate and examine the psychometric properties of the Malay version of the 17-item Diabetes Distress Scale (MDDS-17) in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D).

Methods: A standard procedure was used to translate the English 17-items Diabetes Distress Scale into Malay language. We used exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with principal axis factoring and promax rotation to investigate the factor structure. We explored reliability by internal consistency and 1-month test-retest reliability. Construct validity was examined using the World Health Organization quality of life-brief questionnaire, Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire and disease-related clinical variables.

Results: A total of 262 patients were included in the analysis with a response rate of 96.7%. A total of 66 patients completed the test-retest after 1 month. EFA supported a three-factor model resulting from the combination of the regimen distress (RD) and interpersonal distress (IPD) subscales; and with a swapping of an item between emotional burden (EB; item 7) and RD (item 3) subscales. Cronbach's α for MDDS-17 was 0.94, the combined RD and IPD subscale was 0.925, the EB subscale was 0.855 and the physician-related distress was 0.823. The test- retest reliability's correlation coefficient was r = 0.29 (n = 66; p = 0.009). There was a significant association between the mean MDDS-17 item score categories (<3 vs ≥3) and HbA1c categories (<7.0% vs ≥7.0%), and medication adherence (medium and high vs ≥low). The instrument discriminated between those having diabetes-related complication, low quality of life, poor medication adherence and depression.

Conclusion: The MDDS-17 has satisfactory psychometric properties. It can be used to map diabetes-related emotional distress for diagnostic or clinical use.

Keywords: Malaysia; Validation; diabetes distress; primary care; type 2 diabetes mellitus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Earles J. et al. Assessing psychosocial distress in diabetes: Development of the diabetes distress scale. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:626–31. - PubMed
    1. Fisher L, Gonzalez JS, Polonsky WH. The confusing tale of depression and distress in patients with diabetes: A call for greater clarity and precision. Diabet Med. 2014;31:764–72. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nicolucci A, Kovacs Burns K, Holt RI. et al. For the DAWN2 study group. Diabetes Attitudes, wishes and needs second study (DAWN2TM): Cross-national benchmarking of diabetes-related psychosocial outcomes for people with diabetes. Diabet Med. 2013;30(7):767–77. - PubMed
    1. Berry E, Lockhart S, Davies M. et al. Diabetes distress: Understanding the hidden struggles of living with diabetes and exploring intervention strategies. Postgrad Med J. 2015 [Epub ahead of print] - PubMed
    1. Ogbera A, Adeyemi-Doro A. Emotional distress is associated with poor self care in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes. 2011;3:348–52. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources