Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr 21;4(4):CD012106.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012106.pub2.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT) 2 inhibitors for prevention or delay of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its associated complications in people at risk for the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus

Affiliations

Sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT) 2 inhibitors for prevention or delay of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its associated complications in people at risk for the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus

Bianca Hemmingsen et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT) 2 inhibitors were recently approved as glucose-lowering interventions in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Potential beneficial or harmful effects of SGLT 2 inhibitors in people at risk for the development of T2DM are unknown.

Objectives: To assess the effects of SGLT 2 inhibitors focusing on the prevention or delay of T2DM and its associated complications in people with impaired glucose tolerance, impaired fasting blood glucose or moderately elevated glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) or any combination of these.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) and reference lists of systematic reviews, articles and health technology assessment reports. We asked investigators of ongoing for information about additional trials. The date of the last search of all databases was January 2016.

Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of any duration comparing SGLT 2 inhibitors with any glucose-lowering intervention, behaviour-changing intervention, placebo or no intervention in people with impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, moderately elevated HbA1c or combinations of these.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors read all abstracts, assessed quality and extracted data independently. We resolved discrepancies by consensus or the involvement of a third author.

Main results: We could not include any RCT in this systematic review. One trial was published in two abstracts, but did not provide separate information of the participants with impaired glucose tolerance, impaired fasting glucose or both. We identified two ongoing trials, both evaluating the effects of dapagliflozin (and metformin) in people at risk for the development of type 2 diabetes and a follow-up of 24 to 26 weeks. Both trials will mainly report on surrogate outcome measures with some data on adverse effects and health-related quality of life.

Authors' conclusions: Due to lack of data it is not possible to conclude whether SGLT 2 inhibitors prevent or delay the diagnosis of T2DM and its associated complications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

BH: this review is part of a series of reviews on interventions for prevention or delay of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its associated complications in persons at increased risk for the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus which is funded by the WHO.

JK: none known.

MIM: none known.

BR: none known.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram.

Update of

  • doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012106

Similar articles

Cited by

References

References to studies excluded from this review

NCT01248364 {published data only}
    1. A Study to Determine Acute (After First Dose) and Chronic (After 28 Days) Effects of Empagliflozin (BI 10773) on Pre and Postprandial Glucose Homeostasis in Patients With Impaired Glucose Tolerance and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Healthy Subjects. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT01248364 (accessed 8 March 2016).

References to ongoing studies

EudraCT 2015‐001552‐30 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Effect of dapagliflozin, metformin and physical activity on glucose variability, body composition and cardiovascular risk in pre‐diabetes (The PRE‐D Trial) ‐ a randomised, parallel, open‐label, intervention study. https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr‐search/trial/2015‐001552‐30/DK/ (accessed 8 March 2016).
NCT02338193 {published data only}
    1. Dapagliflozin and metformin, alone and in combination, in overweight/obese prior GDM women (DAPA‐GDM). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02338193 (accessed 5 March 2016).

Additional references

Abdul‐Ghani 2006
    1. Abdul‐Ghani MA, Jenkinson CP, Richardson DK, Tripathy D, DeFronzo RA. Insulin secretion and action in subjects with impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance: results from the Veterans Administration Genetic Epidemiology Study. Diabetes 2006;55(5):1430‐5. [PUBMED: 16644701] - PubMed
ADA 1997
    1. The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 1997;20(7):1183‐97. - PubMed
ADA 2003
    1. Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2003;26(Suppl 1):S5‐20. - PubMed
ADA 2008
    1. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes‐2008. Diabetes Care 2008;31(Suppl 1):S12‐54. [PUBMED: 18165335] - PubMed
ADA 2010
    1. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2010;33(Suppl 1):S62‐9. [PUBMED: 20042775] - PMC - PubMed
ADA 2015
    1. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes‐2015. Diabetes Care 2015;38(Suppl 1):S1‐93. [PUBMED: 24357209] - PubMed
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals 2014
    1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals. Farxiga product information. http://www.azpicentral.com/farxiga/pi_farxiga.pdf#page=1 (accessed 15th October 2015).
Bell 2013
    1. Bell ML, McKenzie JE. Designing psycho‐oncology randomised trials and cluster randomised trials: variance components and intra‐cluster correlation of commonly used psychosocial measures. Psychooncology 2013;22(8):1738‐47. - PubMed
Beller 2013
    1. Beller EM, Chen JK, Wang UL, Glasziou PP. Are systematic reviews up‐to‐date at the time of publication?. Systematic Reviews 2013;2:36. [DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-36] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals 2014
    1. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. JARDIANCE® product information. http://docs.boehringer‐ingelheim.com/Prescribing%20Information/PIs/Jardiance/jardiance.pdf (accessed 15th October 2015).
Boutron 2014
    1. Boutron I, Altman DG, Hopewell S, Vera‐Badillo F, Tannock I, Ravaud P. Impact of spin in the abstracts of articles reporting results of randomized controlled trials in the field of cancer: the SPIIN randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2014;32(36):4120‐6. - PubMed
Brok 2009
    1. Brok J, Thorlund K, Wetterslev J, Gluud C. Apparently conclusive meta‐analyses may be inconclusive‐‐Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta‐analyses. International Journal of Epidemiology 2009;38(1):287‐98. [PUBMED: 18824466] - PubMed
CDC 2015
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2014 National Diabetes Statistics Report. http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics/2014statisticsreport.html (accessed 15 th October 2015).
Cheng 2006
    1. Cheng C, Kushner H, Falkner BE. The utility of fasting glucose for detection of prediabetes. Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental 2006;55(4):434‐8. [PUBMED: 16546472] - PubMed
ClinicalTrials.gov
    1. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=prediabetes+drugs&Search.... Accessed 12th February 2016.
Corbett 2014
    1. Corbett MS, Higgins JP, Woolacott NF. Assessing baseline imbalance in randomised trials: implications for the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Research Synthesis Methods 2014;5(1):79‐85. - PubMed
Cordoba 2010
    1. Cordoba G, Schwartz L, Woloshin S, Bae H, Gotzsche PC. Definition, reporting, and interpretation of composite outcomes in clinical trials: systematic review. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 2010;341:c3920. [PUBMED: 20719825] - PMC - PubMed
DeFronzo 1989
    1. DeFronzo RA, Ferrannini E, Simonson DC. Fasting hyperglycemia in non‐insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus: contributions of excessive hepatic glucose production and impaired tissue glucose uptake. Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental 1989;38(4):387‐95. [PUBMED: 2657323] - PubMed
Diabetes Prevention Program 2002
    1. Knowler WC, Barrett‐Connor E, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Lachin JM, Walker EA, et al. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. The New England Journal of Medicine 2002;346(6):393‐403. [PUBMED: 11832527] - PMC - PubMed
Diabetes Prevention Program FU 2009
    1. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group, Knowler WC, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Christophi CA, Hoffman HJ, et al. 10‐year follow‐up of diabetes incidence and weight loss in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study. Lancet 2009;374(9702):1677‐86. [DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61457-4; PUBMED: 19878986] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Dunkley 2014
    1. Dunkley AJ, Bodicoat DH, Greaves CJ, Russell C, Yates T, Davies MJ, et al. Diabetes prevention in the real world: effectiveness of pragmatic lifestyle interventions for the prevention of type 2 diabetes and of the impact of adherence to guideline recommendations: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Diabetes Care 2014;37(4):922‐33. [PUBMED: 24652723] - PubMed
Egbewale 2014
    1. Egbewale BE, Lewis M, Sim J. Bias, precision and statistical power of analysis of covariance in the analysis of randomized trials with baseline imbalance: a simulation study. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2014;14:49. [DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-49] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
EMA 2012
    1. European Medicines Agency. Summary of the European public assessment report (EPAR) for Forxiga. http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/medicines/human/medici... (accessed 15 th October 2015).
EMPA‐REG 2015
    1. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, Fitchett D, Bluhmki E, Hantel S, et al. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. The New England Journal of Medicine 2015;373(22):2117‐28. [PUBMED: 26378978] - PubMed
FDA 2013
    1. U.S. Food, Drug Administration. FDA news release: FDA approves Invokana to treat type 2 diabetes. http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm345848.htm (accessed 15th October 2015).
FDA 2014a
    1. U.S. Food, Drug Administration. FDA news release: FDA approves Farxiga to treat type 2 diabetes. http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm380829.htm (accessed 15th October 2015).
FDA 2014b
    1. U.S. Food, Drug Administration. FDA news release: FDA approves Jardiance to treat type 2 diabetes. http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm407637.htm (accessed 15th October 2015).
FDA 2015
    1. U.S. Food, Drug Administration. FDA Drug Safety Communication: FDA warns that SGLT2 inhibitors for diabetes may result in a serious condition of too much acid in the blood. http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm446845.htm (accessed 15th October 2015).
Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study Group 2001
    1. Tuomilehto J, Lindström J, Eriksson JG, Valle TT, Hämäläinen H, Ilanne‐Parikka P, et al. Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. The New England Journal of Medicine 2001;344(18):1343‐50. [PUBMED: 11333990] - PubMed
Gosmanov 2014
    1. Gosmanov AR, Wan J. Low positive predictive value of hemoglobin A1c for diagnosis of prediabetes in clinical practice. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences 2014;348(3):191‐4. [PUBMED: 24556928] - PubMed
GRADEpro GDT 2015 [Computer program]
    1. McMaster University (developed by Evidence Prime, Inc.). GRADEpro GDT: GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool. Available from www.gradepro.org. Hamilton: McMaster University (developed by Evidence Prime, Inc.), 2015.
Higgins 2002
    1. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis. Statistics in Medicine 2002;21(11):1539‐58. - PubMed
Higgins 2003
    1. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta‐analysis. BMJ 2003;327(7414):557‐60. - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2009
    1. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Spiegelhalter DJ. A re‐evaluation of random‐effects meta‐analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 2009;172(1):137‐59. - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2010
    1. Higgins JP, Whitehead A, Simmonds M. Sequential methods for random‐effects meta‐analysis. Statistics in Medicine 2011;30(9):903‐21. [PUBMED: 21190240] - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2011a
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Higgins 2011b
    1. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011;343:d5928. - PMC - PubMed
Hróbjartsson 2013
    1. Hróbjartsson A, Thomsen AS, Emanuelsson F, Tendal B, Hilden J, Boutron I, et al. Observer bias in randomized clinical trials with measurement scale outcomes: a systematic review of trials with both blinded and nonblinded assessors. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2013;185(4):E201‐11. - PMC - PubMed
ICH‐GCP 1997
    1. International Conference on Harmonisation Expert Working Group. International conference on harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use. ICH harmonised tripartite guideline. Guideline for good clinical practice CFR & ICH Guidelines. USA: Barnett International/PAREXEL, 1997; Vol. 1.
IDF 2013
    1. International Diabetes Federation. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 6th Edition. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation, 2013.
IEC 2009
    1. International Expert Committee. International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009;32(7):1327‐34. [PUBMED: 19502545] - PMC - PubMed
Inzucchi 2012
    1. Inzucchi SE. Clinical practice. Diagnosis of diabetes. The New England Journal of Medicine 2012;367(6):542‐50. [PUBMED: 22873534] - PubMed
Janssen Pharmaceuticals 2013
    1. Janssen Pharmaceuticals. INVOKANA® prescribing information sheet. Published 2013. https://www.invokanahcp.com/prescribing‐information.pdf (accessed 15th October 2015).
Jensen 2002
    1. Jensen CC, Cnop M, Hull RL, Fujimoto WY, Kahn SE. Beta‐cell function is a major contributor to oral glucose tolerance in high‐risk relatives of four ethnic groups in the U.S. Diabetes 2002;51(7):2170‐8. [PUBMED: 12086947] - PubMed
Kaji 2015
    1. Kaji AH, Lewis RJ. Noninferiority trials: is a new treatment almost as effective as another?. JAMA 2015;313(23):2371‐2. [PUBMED: 26080342] - PubMed
Kirkham 2010
    1. Kirkham JJ, Dwan KM, Altman DG, Gamble C, Dodd S, Smyth R, et al. The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews. BMJ 2010;340:c365. [DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c365] - DOI - PubMed
Lan 1983
    1. Lan KKG, DeMets DL. Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials. Biometrika 1983;70:659‐63.
Liberati 2009
    1. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic and meta‐analyses of studies that evaluate interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine 2009;6(7):e1000100. [DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
List 2011
    1. List JF, Whaley JM. Glucose dynamics and mechanistic implications of SGLT2 inhibitors in animals and humans. Kidney International. Supplement 2011;79(Suppl 120):S20‐7. - PubMed
Lundh 2012
    1. Lundh A, Sismondo S, Lexchin J, Busuioc OA, Bero L. Industry sponsorship and research outcome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 12. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000033.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Mather 2011
    1. Mather A, Pollock C. Glucose handling by the kidney. Kidney International. Supplement 2011;120:S1‐6. [PUBMED: 21358696] - PubMed
Mathieu 2009
    1. Mathieu S, Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Ravaud P. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials. JAMA 2009;302(9):977‐84. - PubMed
Meader 2014
    1. Meader N, King K, Llewellyn A, Norman G, Brown J, Rodgers M, et al. A checklist designed to aid consistency and reproducibility of GRADE assessments: development and pilot validation. Systematic Reviews 2014;3:82. - PMC - PubMed
Morris 2013
    1. Morris DH, Khunti K, Achana F, Srinivasan B, Gray LJ, Davies MJ, et al. Progression rates from HbA1c 6.0‐6.4% and other prediabetes definitions to type 2 diabetes: a meta‐analysis. Diabetologia 2013;56(7):1489‐93. [PUBMED: 23584433] - PubMed
NDDG 1979
    1. National Diabetes Data Group. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance. National Diabetes Data Group. Diabetes 1979;28(12):1039‐57. [PUBMED: 510803] - PubMed
Pogue 1997
    1. Pogue JM, Yusuf S. Cumulating evidence from randomized trials: utilizing sequential monitoring boundaries for cumulative meta‐analysis. Controlled Clinical Trials 1997;18(6):580‐93; discussion 661‐6. [PUBMED: 9408720] - PubMed
Rahmoune 2005
    1. Rahmoune H, Thompson PW, Ward JM, Smith CD, Hong G, Brown J. Glucose transporters in human renal proximal tubular cells isolated from the urine of patients with non‐insulin‐dependent diabetes. Diabetes 2005;54(12):3427‐34. [PUBMED: 16306358] - PubMed
RevMan 2014 [Computer program]
    1. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
Riley 2011
    1. Riley RD, Higgins JP, Deeks JJ. Interpretation of random effects meta‐analyses. BMJ 2011;342:d549. - PubMed
Riley 2013
    1. Riley RD, Kauser I, Bland M, Thijs L, Staessen JA, Wang J, et al. Meta‐analysis of randomised trials with a continuous outcome according to baseline imbalance and availability of individual participant data. Statistics in Medicine 2013;32(16):2747‐66. - PubMed
Sarich 2010
    1. Sarich T, Devineni D, Ghosh A, Wexler D, Shalayda K, Blake J, et al. Canagliflozin, a novel inhibitor of sodium glucose co‐transporter 2, increases 24‐hour urinary glucose excretion and reduces body weight in obese subjects over 2 weeks of treatment. Diabetologia. 2010; Vol. 53, Issue 0:pp. S349‐S350.
Sarich 2010a
    1. Sarich T, Devineni D, Ghosh A, Wexler D, Shalayda K, Blake J, et al. Canagliflozin, a novel inhibitor of sodium glucose co‐transporter 2 (SGLT2), increases 24‐h urinary glucose excretion and decreases body weight in obese subjects. Diabetes. 2010; Vol. 59(Suppl 1):567‐P.
Scheen 2015
    1. Scheen, A. Pharmacodynamics, efficacy and safety of sodium–glucose co‐transporter type 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Drugs 2015;75(1):33‐59. - PubMed
Selvin 2011
    1. Selvin E, Steffes MW, Ballantyne CM, Hoogeveen RC, Coresh J, Brancati FL. Racial differences in glycemic markers: a cross‐sectional analysis of community‐based data. Annals of Internal Medicine 2011;154(5):303‐9. [PUBMED: 21357907] - PMC - PubMed
Sterne 2011
    1. Sterne JA, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JP, Terrin N, Jones DR, Lau J, et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta‐analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2011;343:d4002. - PubMed
Viera 2011
    1. Viera AJ. Predisease: when does it make sense?. Epidemiologic Reviews 2011;33:122‐34. - PubMed
Wetterslev 2008
    1. Wetterslev J, Thorlund K, Brok J, Gluud C. Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta‐analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2008;61(1):64‐75. [PUBMED: 18083463] - PubMed
WHO 1998
    1. Alberti KM, Zimmet PZ. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part I: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabetic Medicine 1998;15(7):539‐53. - PubMed
WHO 1999
    1. World Health Organization. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications: report of a WHO consultation. Part 1. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1999.
WHO/IDF 2006
    1. World Health Organization/International Diabetes Federation. Definition and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and intermediate hyperglycaemia. Report of a WHO/IDF consultation. 2006. http://www.idf.org/webdata/docs/WHO_IDF_definition_diagnosis_of_diabetes... (accessed 15th October 2015).
Wong 2006
    1. Wong SSL, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB. Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound treatment studies in EMBASE. Journal of the Medical Library Association 2006;94(1):41‐7. - PMC - PubMed
Wood 2008
    1. Wood L, Egger M, Gluud LL, Schulz KF, Jüni P, Altman DG, et al. Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta‐epidemiological study. BMJ 2008;336(7644):601‐5. - PMC - PubMed
Yudkin 2011
    1. Yudkin JS, Lipska KJ, Montori VM. The idolatry of the surrogate. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 2011;343:d7995. [PUBMED: 22205706] - PubMed
Yudkin 2014
    1. Yudkin JS, Montori VM. The epidemic of pre‐diabetes: the medicine and the politics. BMJ 2014;349:g4485. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources