Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr 22:6:24955.
doi: 10.1038/srep24955.

Systematic Analysis of Adverse Event Reports for Sex Differences in Adverse Drug Events

Affiliations

Systematic Analysis of Adverse Event Reports for Sex Differences in Adverse Drug Events

Yue Yu et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Increasing evidence has shown that sex differences exist in Adverse Drug Events (ADEs). Identifying those sex differences in ADEs could reduce the experience of ADEs for patients and could be conducive to the development of personalized medicine. In this study, we analyzed a normalized US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Chi-squared test was conducted to discover which treatment regimens or drugs had sex differences in adverse events. Moreover, reporting odds ratio (ROR) and P value were calculated to quantify the signals of sex differences for specific drug-event combinations. Logistic regression was applied to remove the confounding effect from the baseline sex difference of the events. We detected among 668 drugs of the most frequent 20 treatment regimens in the United States, 307 drugs have sex differences in ADEs. In addition, we identified 736 unique drug-event combinations with significant sex differences. After removing the confounding effect from the baseline sex difference of the events, there are 266 combinations remained. Drug labels or previous studies verified some of them while others warrant further investigation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Heat Map of Sex Differences in drug-event combinations of 20 Treatment Regimens at the System Organ Class Category Level.
Heat map shows positive signals of sex differences. The color of each cell is based on the logarithmic reporting odds ratio (ROR) for occurrence of drug-event combinations in the sex; blue cell represents the log2 ROR > 0, red cell represents the log2 ROR < 0; the darker the color, the greater the absolute value of ROR. P values were calculated using a proportion test and were adjusted by Bonferroni correction. Only drug-event combinations with sex differences significant at P ≤ .05 were selected. ADHD indicates attention-deficit/hypersensitivity disorder; incl, including.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Volcano Plot of Significant Adverse Drug Event (ADE) Signals.
In the volcano plot of ADE signals, the signal detection result shows the magnitude (log2 reporting odds ratio [ROR], x-axis) and significance (−log10 adjusted P value, y-axis) for sex- drug-event combinations associations of specific drugs. Each spot represents a specific drug- drug-event combination interaction. The dashed horizontal green line signals statistical significance threshold (P ≤ 0.05 after adjustment with Bonferroni correction). Two vertical green lines show the threshold of ROR (log2 ROR > 1 or < −1). The blue spots represent the drug-event combinations more frequently associated with female patients; the red spots, drug-event combinations more frequently associated with male patients.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lazarou J., Pomeranz B. H. & Corey P. N. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Jama-J Am Med Assoc 279, 1200–1205 (1998). - PubMed
    1. Classen D. C., Pestotnik S. L., Evans R. S., Lloyd J. F. & Burke J. P. Adverse drug events in hospitalized patients-Excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality. Jama-J Am Med Assoc 277, 301–306 (1997). - PubMed
    1. Hartung T. Toxicology for the twenty-first century. Nature 460, 208–212 (2009). - PubMed
    1. Stricker B. H. C. & Psaty B. M. Detection, verification, and quantification of adverse drug reactions. BMJ-Brit Med J 329, 44–47 (2004). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harpaz R. et al. Novel data-mining methodologies for adverse drug event discovery and analysis. Clin Pharmacol Ther 91, 1010–1021 (2012). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types