Probing the nanoadhesion of Streptococcus sanguinis to titanium implant surfaces by atomic force microscopy
- PMID: 27103802
- PMCID: PMC4827898
- DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S100768
Probing the nanoadhesion of Streptococcus sanguinis to titanium implant surfaces by atomic force microscopy
Abstract
As titanium (Ti) continues to be utilized in great extent for the fabrication of artificial implants, it is important to understand the crucial bacterium-Ti interaction occurring during the initial phases of biofilm formation. By employing a single-cell force spectroscopy technique, the nanoadhesive interactions between the early-colonizing Streptococcus sanguinis and a clinically analogous smooth Ti substrate were explored. Mean adhesion forces between S. sanguinis and Ti were found to be 0.32±0.00, 1.07±0.06, and 4.85±0.56 nN for 0, 1, and 60 seconds contact times, respectively; while adhesion work values were reported at 19.28±2.38, 104.60±7.02, and 1,317.26±197.69 aJ for 0, 1, and 60 seconds, respectively. At 60 seconds surface delays, minor-rupture events were modeled with the worm-like chain model yielding an average contour length of 668±12 nm. The mean force for S. sanguinis minor-detachment events was 1.84±0.64 nN, and Poisson analysis decoupled this value into a short-range force component of -1.60±0.34 nN and a long-range force component of -0.55±0.47 nN. Furthermore, a solution of 2 mg/mL chlorhexidine was found to increase adhesion between the bacterial probe and substrate. Overall, single-cell force spectroscopy of living S. sanguinis cells proved to be a reliable way to characterize early-bacterial adhesion onto machined Ti implant surfaces at the nanoscale.
Keywords: atomic force microscopy; bacterial adhesion; biophysics; dental implants; titanium.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Nanoadhesion of Staphylococcus aureus onto Titanium Implant Surfaces.J Dent Res. 2015 Aug;94(8):1078-84. doi: 10.1177/0022034515591485. Epub 2015 Jun 30. J Dent Res. 2015. PMID: 26130256
-
Effect of enamel morphology on nanoscale adhesion forces of streptococcal bacteria : An AFM study.Scanning. 2015 Sep-Oct;37(5):313-21. doi: 10.1002/sca.21218. Epub 2015 Apr 24. Scanning. 2015. PMID: 26482011
-
Initial in vitro bacterial adhesion on dental restorative materials.Int J Artif Organs. 2012 Oct;35(10):773-79. doi: 10.5301/ijao.5000153. Int J Artif Organs. 2012. PMID: 23065885
-
Statistical analysis of long- and short-range forces involved in bacterial adhesion to substratum surfaces as measured using atomic force microscopy.Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Aug;77(15):5065-70. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00502-11. Epub 2011 Jun 3. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011. PMID: 21642399 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Balancing osteoblast functions and bacterial adhesion on functionalized titanium surfaces.Biomaterials. 2012 Apr;33(10):2813-22. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.018. Epub 2012 Jan 16. Biomaterials. 2012. PMID: 22257725 Review.
Cited by
-
Bacterial adhesion to biomaterials: What regulates this attachment? A review.Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2021 Nov;57:85-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2021.05.003. Epub 2021 Jun 12. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2021. PMID: 34188729 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Bacterial Adhesion Strength on Titanium Surfaces Quantified by Atomic Force Microscopy: A Systematic Review.Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Jun 1;12(6):994. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12060994. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37370313 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Influence of the Available Surface Area and Cell Elasticity on Bacterial Adhesion Forces on Highly Ordered Silicon Nanopillars.ACS Omega. 2022 May 17;7(21):17620-17631. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c00356. eCollection 2022 May 31. ACS Omega. 2022. PMID: 35664577 Free PMC article.
-
Adhesion Forces of Oral Bacteria to Titanium and the Correlation with Biophysical Cellular Characteristics.Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Oct 17;9(10):567. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9100567. Bioengineering (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36290534 Free PMC article.
-
Nanostructures as Targeted Therapeutics for Combating Oral Bacterial Diseases.Biomedicines. 2021 Oct 10;9(10):1435. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9101435. Biomedicines. 2021. PMID: 34680553 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Geetha M, Singh AK, Asokamani R, Gogia AK. Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants – A review. Prog Mater Sci. 2009;54(3):397–425.
-
- Webb HK, Boshkovikj V, Fluke CJ, et al. Bacterial attachment on sub-nanometrically smooth titanium substrata. Biofouling. 2013;29(2):163–170. - PubMed
-
- Albrektsson T, Donos N, Working Group 1 Implant survival and complications. The Third EAO consensus conference 2012. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(Suppl 6):63–65. - PubMed
-
- Donos N, Laurell L, Mardas N. Hierarchical decisions on teeth vs. implants in the periodontitis-susceptible patient: the modern dilemma. Periodontol. 2000. 2012;59(1):89–110. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Research Materials