Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr;6(2):190-197.
doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000240.

Patient engagement and shared decision-making: What do they look like in neurology practice?

Affiliations

Patient engagement and shared decision-making: What do they look like in neurology practice?

Melissa J Armstrong et al. Neurol Clin Pract. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Neurology is inherently patient-centered given that clinical uncertainty is common, forcing physicians, patients, and families to partner on treatment approach. An increasing emphasis on patient-centered care, patient engagement, and shared decision-making (SDM) in health care provides neurologists with an opportunity to reassess current clinical approaches to decision-making. Such assessment is not simply theoretical but has clear practice implications, with patients indicating a desire for SDM and calls for reimbursement to be tied to demonstration of SDM in practice. We present a framework for how neurologists enhance patient-centered practice by (1) eliciting patients' values and goals, (2) targeting discussion of clinical options to those values and goals, and (3) partnering with patients to make individualized decisions. We also highlight resources that facilitate SDM and examples of SDM in neurology clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure. Framework for patient engagement in clinical encounters
This framework for patient engagement and shared decision-making (SDM) in clinical visits shows patients at the top providing overall guidance, supported by carepartners and caregivers when relevant. Patients' values (blue) inform their goals (green) and both inform evidence-based discussions of health care options (e.g., tests, treatments) and decisions regarding the best options to achieve their goals. The 3 steps for patient engagement and SDM are outlined (boxes), with each step requiring participation by both physicians and patients. In neurology, this process most commonly occurs in the setting of clinical uncertainty, but it is relevant in situations with clinical certainty as well.

References

    1. Institute of Medicine (IOM). Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001. - PubMed
    1. Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making: pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med 2012;366:780–781. - PubMed
    1. Shay LA, Lafata JE. Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes. Med Decis Making 2015;35:114–131. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chewning B, Bylund CL, Shah B, Arora NK, Gueguen JA, Makoul G. Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns 2012;86:9–18. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A, Thisted RA. Not all patients want to participate in decision making: a national study of public preferences. J Gen Intern Med 2005;20:531–535. - PMC - PubMed