Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov;23(6):1096-1106.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw012. Epub 2016 Apr 23.

Public preferences for electronic health data storage, access, and sharing - evidence from a pan-European survey

Sunil Patil  1 , Hui Lu  2 , Catherine L Saunders  2 , Dimitris Potoglou  3 , Neil Robinson  2
Affiliations

Public preferences for electronic health data storage, access, and sharing - evidence from a pan-European survey

Sunil Patil et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the public's preferences regarding potential privacy threats from devices or services storing health-related personal data.

Materials and methods: A pan-European survey based on a stated-preference experiment for assessing preferences for electronic health data storage, access, and sharing.

Results: We obtained 20 882 survey responses (94 606 preferences) from 27 EU member countries. Respondents recognized the benefits of storing electronic health information, with 75.5%, 63.9%, and 58.9% agreeing that storage was important for improving treatment quality, preventing epidemics, and reducing delays, respectively. Concerns about different levels of access by third parties were expressed by 48.9% to 60.6% of respondents.On average, compared to devices or systems that only store basic health status information, respondents preferred devices that also store identification data (coefficient/relative preference 95% CI = 0.04 [0.00-0.08], P = 0.034) and information on lifelong health conditions (coefficient = 0.13 [0.08 to 0.18], P < 0.001), but there was no evidence of this for devices with information on sensitive health conditions such as mental and sexual health and addictions (coefficient = -0.03 [-0.09 to 0.02], P = 0.24). Respondents were averse to their immediate family (coefficient = -0.05 [-0.05 to -0.01], P = 0.011) and home care nurses (coefficient = -0.06 [-0.11 to -0.02], P = 0.004) viewing this data, and strongly averse to health insurance companies (coefficient = -0.43 [-0.52 to 0.34], P < 0.001), private sector pharmaceutical companies (coefficient = -0.82 [-0.99 to -0.64], P < 0.001), and academic researchers (coefficient = -0.53 [-0.66 to -0.40], P < 0.001) viewing the data.

Conclusions: Storing more detailed electronic health data was generally preferred, but respondents were averse to wider access to and sharing of this information. When developing frameworks for the use of electronic health data, policy makers should consider approaches that both highlight the benefits to the individual and minimize the perception of privacy risks.

Keywords: Health records; attitudes; data privacy; personal data; public preferences; stated preference.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Stated preference experiment: Introductory text and example scenario presented to participants
Figure 2
Figure 2
Levels of high health privacy concern across Europe
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Schwartz PH Caine K Alpert SA et al. . Patient preferences in controlling access to their electronic health records: a prospective cohort study in primary care . J General Int Med. 2014. . Published Online First: doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3054-z . - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adler-Milstein J Jha AK . No evidence found that hospitals are using new electronic health records to increase Medicare reimbursements . Health Affairs. 2014. ; 33 ( 7 ): 1271 – 1277 . - PubMed
    1. Ioannidis JP . Are mortality differences detected by administrative data reliable and actionable? JAMA. 2013. ; 309 ( 13 ): 1410 – 1411 . - PubMed
    1. Robinson N Potoglou D Kim CW et al. . Security at what cost? Quantifying people's trade-offs across liberty, privacy, and security. 2010. http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR664.html . Accessed July 25, 2014 .
    1. National Information Board . Personalised Health and Care 2020. 2014 .

Publication types