Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov;23(6):1060-1067.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv207. Epub 2016 Apr 23.

An efficient approach for surveillance of childhood diabetes by type derived from electronic health record data: the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study

Affiliations

An efficient approach for surveillance of childhood diabetes by type derived from electronic health record data: the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study

Victor W Zhong et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: To develop an efficient surveillance approach for childhood diabetes by type across 2 large US health care systems, using phenotyping algorithms derived from electronic health record (EHR) data.

Materials and methods: Presumptive diabetes cases <20 years of age from 2 large independent health care systems were identified as those having ≥1 of the 5 indicators in the past 3.5 years, including elevated HbA1c, elevated blood glucose, diabetes-related billing codes, patient problem list, and outpatient anti-diabetic medications. EHRs of all the presumptive cases were manually reviewed, and true diabetes status and diabetes type were determined. Algorithms for identifying diabetes cases overall and classifying diabetes type were either prespecified or derived from classification and regression tree analysis. Surveillance approach was developed based on the best algorithms identified.

Results: We developed a stepwise surveillance approach using billing code-based prespecified algorithms and targeted manual EHR review, which efficiently and accurately ascertained and classified diabetes cases by type, in both health care systems. The sensitivity and positive predictive values in both systems were approximately ≥90% for ascertaining diabetes cases overall and classifying cases with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. About 80% of the cases with "other" type were also correctly classified. This stepwise surveillance approach resulted in a >70% reduction in the number of cases requiring manual validation compared to traditional surveillance methods.

Conclusion: EHR data may be used to establish an efficient approach for large-scale surveillance for childhood diabetes by type, although some manual effort is still needed.

Keywords: ascertainment and classification; automated algorithm; childhood diabetes; electronic health records; surveillance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
(A) The stepwise surveillance approach at MUSC. (B) The stepwise surveillance approach at UNC.Abbreviations: MUSC: Medical University of South Carolina; FP: false positive; T1D: type 1. diabetes; T2D: type 2 diabetes; UNC: University of North Carolina.

References

    1. Dabelea D, Mayer-Davis EJ, Saydah S, et al. Prevalence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes among children and adolescents from 2001 to 2009. JAMA. 2014;311:1778–1786. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lipman TH, Levitt Katz LE, Ratcliffe SJ, et al. Increasing incidence of type 1 diabetes in youth: twenty years of the Philadelphia Pediatric Diabetes Registry. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:1597–1603. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith TL, Drum ML, Lipton RB. Incidence of childhood type I and non-type 1 diabetes mellitus in a diverse population: the Chicago Childhood Diabetes Registry, 1994 to 2003. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2007;20:1093–1107. - PubMed
    1. Bobo N, Evert A, Gallivan J, et al. An update on type 2 diabetes in youth from the National Diabetes Education Program. Pediatrics. 2004;114:259–263. - PubMed
    1. Writing Group for the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study Group, Dabelea D, Bell RA, et al. Incidence of diabetes in youth in the United States. JAMA. 2007;297:2716–2724. - PubMed

Publication types