Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug:94:246-54.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.03.044. Epub 2016 Apr 20.

National Variation in Urethroplasty Cost and Predictors of Extreme Cost: A Cost Analysis With Policy Implications

Affiliations

National Variation in Urethroplasty Cost and Predictors of Extreme Cost: A Cost Analysis With Policy Implications

Catherine R Harris et al. Urology. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To determine which factors are associated with higher costs of urethroplasty procedure and whether these factors have been increasing over time. Identification of determinants of extreme costs may help reduce cost while maintaining quality.

Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using the 2001-2010 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-Nationwide Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS). The HCUP-NIS captures hospital charges which we converted to cost using the HCUP cost-to-charge ratio. Log cost linear regression with sensitivity analysis was used to determine variables associated with increased costs. Extreme cost was defined as the top 20th percentile of expenditure, analyzed with logistic regression, and expressed as odds ratios (OR).

Results: A total of 2298 urethroplasties were recorded in NIS over the study period. The median (interquartile range) calculated cost was $7321 ($5677-$10,000). Patients with multiple comorbid conditions were associated with extreme costs [OR 1.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19-2.04, P = .02] compared with patients with no comorbid disease. Inpatient complications raised the odds of extreme costs (OR 3.2, CI 2.14-4.75, P <.001). Graft urethroplasties were associated with extreme costs (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.2-2.64, P = .005). Variations in patient age, race, hospital region, bed size, teaching status, payor type, and volume of urethroplasty cases were not associated with extremes of cost.

Conclusion: Cost variation for perioperative inpatient urethroplasty procedures is dependent on preoperative patient comorbidities, postoperative complications, and surgical complexity related to graft usage. Procedural cost and cost variation are critical for understanding which aspects of care have the greatest impact on cost.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Multivariate analysis of Variables Associated with Extreme Cost (top 20%) Urethroplasty after adjusting for age, race and year

Comment in

  • Editorial Comment.
    Rourke KF. Rourke KF. Urology. 2016 Aug;94:254. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.03.046. Epub 2016 Jun 30. Urology. 2016. PMID: 27373986 No abstract available.

References

    1. Santucci RA, Joyce GF, Wise M. Male urethral stricture disease. The Journal of urology. 2007;177(5):1667–74. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.041. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lubahn JD, Zhao LC, Scott JF, Hudak SJ, Chee J, Terlecki R, et al. Poor quality of life in patients with urethral stricture treated with intermittent self-dilation. The Journal of urology. 2014;191(1):143–7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.06.054. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mundy AR. Management of urethral strictures. Postgrad Med J. 2006;82(970):489–93. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2005.042945. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barbagli G, De Angelis M, Romano G, Lazzeri M. Long-term followup of bulbar end-to-end anastomosis: a retrospective analysis of 153 patients in a single center experience. The Journal of urology. 2007;178(6):2470–3. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wright JL, Wessells H, Nathens AB, Hollingworth W. What is the most cost-effective treatment for 1 to 2-cm bulbar urethral strictures: societal approach using decision analysis. Urology. 2006;67(5):889–93. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.11.003. - DOI - PubMed