Cost-effectiveness and programmatic benefits of maternal vaccination against pertussis in England
- PMID: 27108802
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2016.04.012
Cost-effectiveness and programmatic benefits of maternal vaccination against pertussis in England
Abstract
Background: Maternal pertussis immunisation was introduced during the pertussis resurgence in England in 2012 as a temporary measure to protect infants too young to be vaccinated. The programme was shown to be safe and highly effective. However, continuation of maternal vaccination as a routine programme requires a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Method: The estimated prevented disease burden among mothers and their infants was obtained assuming 89% (95% CI: 19%-99%) vaccine efficacy for mothers and 91% (95% CI: 84%-95%) for infants. Future incidence was projected based on the disease rates in 2010-2012, including the four-year cycle of low and high incidence years. Full probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed for different scenarios.
Results: Assuming a vaccine coverage of 60%, there were 1650 prevented hospitalisations in infants (3.5% discounting, the first 10 years), including 55-60 deaths and ∼20,500 cases among mothers, of which around 1800 would be severe. The annual costs of the programme are £7.3 million assuming a price of £10 per dose and £9.4 million assuming £15 per dose. Using discounting of 3.5%, a 200 year time horizon and a price of £10 per dose (+£7.5 administration costs) only 25% of the iterations were below £30,000 per QALY. Using a 35% higher incidence resulted in 88% of the scenarios below this threshold. Assuming that the incidence remains at the level at the height of 2012, then the programme would be highly cost effective, with an ICER of £16,865 (£12,209-£25,976; price of £10 and 3.5%/3.5% discounting).
Conclusion: Maternal vaccination is effective in preventing severe illness and deaths in infants but the cost-effectiveness of the programme is highly dependent on future incidence which is necessarily uncertain. However, the duration and magnitude of protection against transmission afforded by the current acellular vaccines is also uncertain as are the associated effects on future herd immunity. The direct protection offered by the maternal dose provides the only certain way of protecting vulnerable infants from birth.
Keywords: Cost-effectiveness; Maternal vaccination; Pertussis; Policymaking; Programmatic considerations.
Crown Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Is adding maternal vaccination to prevent whooping cough cost-effective in Australia?Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018;14(9):2263-2273. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1474315. Epub 2018 Jun 22. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018. PMID: 29771574 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of targeted vaccination to protect new-borns against pertussis: comparing neonatal, maternal, and cocooning vaccination strategies.Vaccine. 2013 Nov 4;31(46):5392-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.09.028. Epub 2013 Sep 27. Vaccine. 2013. PMID: 24075918
-
Evaluating the impact of a continued maternal pertussis immunisation programme in England: A modelling study and cost-effectiveness analysis.Vaccine. 2021 Jul 22;39(32):4500-4509. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.06.042. Epub 2021 Jun 26. Vaccine. 2021. PMID: 34183204 Free PMC article.
-
Dynamic models for health economic assessments of pertussis vaccines: what goes around comes around...Expert Rev Vaccines. 2012 Dec;11(12):1415-28. doi: 10.1586/erv.12.130. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2012. PMID: 23252386 Review.
-
The case for maternal vaccination against pertussis.Lancet Infect Dis. 2007 Sep;7(9):614-24. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70113-5. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007. PMID: 17537674 Review.
Cited by
-
What Pertussis Mortality Rates Make Maternal Acellular Pertussis Immunization Cost-Effective in Low- and Middle-Income Countries? A Decision Analysis.Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Dec 1;63(suppl 4):S227-S235. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw558. Clin Infect Dis. 2016. PMID: 27838677 Free PMC article.
-
Is adding maternal vaccination to prevent whooping cough cost-effective in Australia?Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018;14(9):2263-2273. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1474315. Epub 2018 Jun 22. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018. PMID: 29771574 Free PMC article.
-
Pertussis vaccination in pregnancy in Canada: a cost-utility analysis.CMAJ Open. 2020 Oct 19;8(4):E651-E658. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200060. Print 2020 Oct-Dec. CMAJ Open. 2020. PMID: 33077536 Free PMC article.
-
Questionnaire survey on maternal pertussis vaccination for pregnant women and mothers in Nara prefecture, Japan.Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020;16(2):335-339. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1651000. Epub 2019 Sep 5. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020. PMID: 31368853 Free PMC article.
-
Modeling the cost-effectiveness of maternal acellular pertussis immunization (aP) in different socioeconomic settings: A dynamic transmission model of pertussis in three Brazilian states.Vaccine. 2021 Jan 3;39(1):125-136. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.09.008. Vaccine. 2021. PMID: 33303180 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical