Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr:61:15-21.
doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2015.12.003.

Eavesdropping on Character: Assessing Everyday Moral Behaviors

Kathryn L Bollich  1 , John M Doris  2 , Simine Vazire  3 , Charles L Raison  4 , Joshua J Jackson  1 , Matthias R Mehl  5
Affiliations

Eavesdropping on Character: Assessing Everyday Moral Behaviors

Kathryn L Bollich et al. J Res Pers. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Despite decades of interest in moral character, comparatively little is known about moral behavior in everyday life. This paper reports a novel method for assessing everyday moral behaviors using the Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR)-a digital audio-recorder that intermittently samples snippets of ambient sounds from people's environments-and examines the stability of these moral behaviors. In three samples (combined N = 186), participants wore an EAR over one or two weekends. Audio files were coded for everyday moral behaviors (e.g., showing sympathy, gratitude) and morally-neutral comparison language behaviors (e.g., use of prepositions, articles). Results indicate that stable individual differences in moral behavior can be systematically observed in daily life, and that their stability is comparable to the stability of neutral language behaviors.

Keywords: Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR); ambulatory assessment; moral behavior; moral character; naturalistic observation; personality; temporal stability.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Alicke MD, Sedikides C. Self-enhancement and self-protection: What they are and what they do. European Review of Social Psychology. 2009;20:1–48. doi:10.1080/10463280802613866.
    1. Aquino K, Freeman D. Moral identity in business situations: A social-cognitive framework for understanding moral functioning. In: Narvaez D, Lapsley DK, Narvaez D, Lapsley DK, editors. Personality, identity, and character: Explorations in moral psychology. Cambridge University Press; New York, NY, US: 2009. pp. 375–395. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511627125.018.
    1. Bateson M, Nettle D, Roberts G. Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology Letters. 2006;2(3):412–414. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Batson C, Kobrynowicz D, Dinnerstein JL, Kampf HC, Wilson AD. In a very different voice: Unmasking moral hypocrisy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1997;72(6):1335–1348. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.6.1335. - PubMed
    1. Baumeister RF, Vohs KD, Funder DC. Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior?. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2007;2(4):396–403. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00051.x. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources