Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan 10;6(1):e30071.
doi: 10.5812/aapm.30071. eCollection 2016 Feb.

Effect of Etomidate Versus Combination of Propofol-Ketamine and Thiopental-Ketamine on Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial

Afshin Gholipour Baradari  1 , Abolfazl Firouzian  1 , Alieh Zamani Kiasari  1 , Mohsen Aarabi  2 , Seyed Abdollah Emadi  1 , Ali Davanlou  1 , Nima Motamed  3 , Ensieh Yousefi Abdolmaleki  4
Affiliations

Effect of Etomidate Versus Combination of Propofol-Ketamine and Thiopental-Ketamine on Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial

Afshin Gholipour Baradari et al. Anesth Pain Med. .

Abstract

Background: Laryngoscopy and intubation frequently used for airway management during general anesthesia, is frequently associated with undesirable hemodynamic disturbances.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of etomidate, combination of propofol-ketamine and thiopental-ketamine as induction agents on hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation.

Patients and methods: In a double blind, randomized clinical trial a total of 120 adult patients of both sexes, aged 18 - 45 years, scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were randomly assigned into three equally sized groups. Patients in group A received etomidate (0.3 mg/kg) plus normal saline as placebo. Patients in group B and C received propofol (1.5 mg/kg) plus ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) and thiopental sodium (3 mg/kg) plus ketamine (0.5 mg/kg), respectively for anesthesia induction. Before laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation, immediately after, and also one and three minutes after the procedures, hemodynamic values (SBP, DBP, MAP and HR) were measured.

Results: A repeated measurement ANOVA showed significant changes in mean SBP and DBP between the time points (P < 0.05). In addition, the main effect of MAP and HR were statistically significant during the course of study (P < 0.05). Furthermore, after induction of anesthesia, the three study groups had significantly different SBP, DBP and MAP changes overtime (P < 0.05). However, HR changes over time were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Combination of propofol-ketamine had superior hemodynamic stability compared to other induction agents.

Conclusions: Combination of propofol-ketamine may be recommended as an effective and safe induction agent for attenuating hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation with better hemodynamic stability. Although, further well-designed randomized clinical trials to confirm the safety and efficacy of this combination, especially in critically ill patients or patients with cardiovascular disease, are warranted.

Keywords: Etomidate; Hemodynamics; Ketamine; Laryngoscopy; Propofol; Thiopental.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Flow Diagram of the Study
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. SBP and DBP Changes During the Study in the Three Treatment Groups (Mean and 95% CI)
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. MAP and HR Changes During the Study in the Three Treatment Groups (Mean and 95% CI)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Habibi MR, Baradari AG, Soleimani A, Emami Zeydi A, Nia HS, Habibi A, et al. Hemodynamic responses to etomidate versus ketamine-thiopental sodium combination for anesthetic induction in coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients with low ejection fraction: a double-blind, randomized, clinical trial. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(10):GC01–5. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/10237.5006. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kord Valeshabad A, Nabavian O, Nourijelyani K, Kord H, Vafainejad H, Kord Valeshabad R, et al. Attenuation of Hemodynamic Responses to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation: Propacetamol versus Lidocaine-A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2014;2014:170247. doi: 10.1155/2014/170247. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dashti M, Amini S, Azarfarin R, Totonchi Z, Hatami M. Hemodynamic changes following endotracheal intubation with glidescope((R)) video-laryngoscope in patients with untreated hypertension. Res Cardiovasc Med. 2014;3(2):e30071. doi: 10.5812/cardiovascmed.17598. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Forbes AM, Dally FG. Acute hypertension during induction of anaesthesia and endotracheal intubation in normotensive man. Br J Anaesth. 1970;42(7):618–24. - PubMed
    1. Abbasivash R, Aghdashi MM, Sinaei B, Kheradmand F. The effects of propofol-midazolam-ketamine co-induction on hemodynamic changes and catecholamine response. J Clin Anesth. 2014;26(8):628–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2014.05.014. - DOI - PubMed