Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr;51(4):283-90.
doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-51.5.06. Epub 2016 Apr 25.

Using Ankle Bracing and Taping to Decrease Range of Motion and Velocity During Inversion Perturbation While Walking

Emily A Hall  1 , Janet E Simon  2 , Carrie L Docherty  1
Affiliations

Using Ankle Bracing and Taping to Decrease Range of Motion and Velocity During Inversion Perturbation While Walking

Emily A Hall et al. J Athl Train. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Context: Prophylactic ankle supports are commonly used. However, the effectiveness of external supports in preventing an inversion stress has been debated.

Objective: To evaluate how ankle bracing and taping affect inversion range of motion, time to maximum inversion, inversion velocity, and perceived ankle stability compared with a control condition during a dynamic inversion perturbation while walking.

Design: Crossover study.

Setting: Research laboratory.

Patients or other participants: A total of 42 physically active participants (16 men, 26 women; age = 21.2 ± 3.3 years, height = 168.9 ± 8.9 cm, mass = 66.1 ± 11.4 kg) volunteered.

Intervention(s): Participants walked on a custom-built walkway that suddenly inverted their ankles to 30° in 3 conditions: brace, tape, and control (no external support). We used an ASO ankle brace for the brace condition and a closed basketweave technique for the tape condition. Three trials were completed for each condition. Main Outcome Measure(s) Maximum inversion (degrees), time to maximum inversion (milliseconds), and inversion velocity (degrees per second) were measured using an electrogoniometer, and perceived stability (centimeters) was measured using a visual analog scale.

Results: Maximum inversion decreased more in the brace condition (20.1°) than in the control (25.3°) or tape (22.3°) conditions (both P values = .001), and the tape condition restricted inversion more than the control condition (P = .001). Time to maximum inversion was greater in the brace condition (143.5 milliseconds) than in the control (123.7 milliseconds; P = .001) or tape (130.7 milliseconds; P = .009) conditions and greater in the tape than in the control condition (P = .02). Inversion velocity was slower in the brace condition (142.6°/s) than in the control (209.1°/s) or tape (174.3°/s) conditions (both P values = .001) and slower in the tape than in the control condition (P = .001). Both the brace and tape conditions provided more perceived stability (0.98 cm and 0.94 cm, respectively) than the control condition (2.38 cm; both P values = .001).

Conclusions: Both prophylactic conditions affected inversion range of motion, time to maximum inversion, inversion velocity, and perceived ankle stability. However, bracing provided more restriction at a slower rate than taping.

Keywords: ankle sprains; dynamic walkway; prophylaxis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
When triggered, the active door opened to approximately 30° of inversion when participants stepped on it. Participants were instructed to keep walking after the sudden perturbation occurred.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Participants performed all 3 conditions. A, Brace. B, Tape. C, Control.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
A graphical representation of 1 trial from each condition.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Almeida SA, Williams KM, Shaffer RA, Brodine SK. Epidemiological patterns of musculoskeletal injuries and physical training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999; 31 8: 1176– 1182. - PubMed
    1. Fernandez WG, Yard EE, Comstock RD. Epidemiology of lower extremity injuries among U.S. high school athletes. Acad Emerg Med. 2007; 14 7: 641– 645. - PubMed
    1. Hootman JM, Dick R, Agel J. Epidemiology of collegiate injuries for 15 sports: summary and recommendations for injury prevention initiatives. J Athl Train. 2007; 42 2: 311– 319. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Braun BL. Effects of ankle sprain in a general population 6 to 18 months after medical evaluation. Arch Fam Med. 1999; 8 2: 143– 148. - PubMed
    1. Waterman BR, Owens BD, Davey S, Zacchilli MA, Belmont PJ., Jr. The epidemiology of ankle sprains in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92 13: 2279– 2284. - PubMed

Publication types