Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May;18(5):516-26.
doi: 10.1038/ncb3343. Epub 2016 Apr 25.

The Aurora-B-dependent NoCut checkpoint prevents damage of anaphase bridges after DNA replication stress

Affiliations

The Aurora-B-dependent NoCut checkpoint prevents damage of anaphase bridges after DNA replication stress

Nuno Amaral et al. Nat Cell Biol. 2016 May.

Abstract

Anaphase chromatin bridges can lead to chromosome breakage if not properly resolved before completion of cytokinesis. The NoCut checkpoint, which depends on Aurora B at the spindle midzone, delays abscission in response to chromosome segregation defects in yeast and animal cells. How chromatin bridges are detected, and whether abscission inhibition prevents their damage, remain key unresolved questions. We find that bridges induced by DNA replication stress and by condensation or decatenation defects, but not dicentric chromosomes, delay abscission in a NoCut-dependent manner. Decatenation and condensation defects lead to spindle stabilization during cytokinesis, allowing bridge detection by Aurora B. NoCut does not prevent DNA damage following condensin or topoisomerase II inactivation; however, it protects anaphase bridges and promotes cellular viability after replication stress. Therefore, the molecular origin of chromatin bridges is critical for activation of NoCut, which plays a key role in the maintenance of genome stability after replicative stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Cell. 2006 Apr 7;125(1):85-98 - PubMed
    1. Cell. 2009 Feb 6;136(3):473-84 - PubMed
    1. Nat Cell Biol. 2009 Apr;11(4):477-83 - PubMed
    1. Exp Cell Res. 2000 Nov 1;260(2):277-83 - PubMed
    1. Science. 2003 Dec 19;302(5653):2120-4 - PubMed

MeSH terms