The Value of Vocal Extent Measure (VEM) Assessing Phonomicrosurgical Outcomes in Vocal Fold Polyps
- PMID: 27112100
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.03.016
The Value of Vocal Extent Measure (VEM) Assessing Phonomicrosurgical Outcomes in Vocal Fold Polyps
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to present vocal extent measure (VEM), demonstrate its changes with phonomicrosurgical treatment in patients with vocal fold polyps (VFPs), and to compare its performance to that of established vocal parameters.
Study design: This is an individual cohort study.
Methods: Microlaryngoscopic ablation was executed in 61 patients with manifestation of VFP (28 male, 33 female; 45 ± 13 years [mean ± SD]). Analysis of treatment outcome was based on pre- and postoperative voice function diagnostics and videolaryngostroboscopy. Examination instruments were: auditory-perceptual voice assessment (roughness, breathiness, and overall hoarseness [RBH]-status), voice range profile (VRP), acoustic-aerodynamic analysis, and patients' self-assessment of voice using the voice handicap index. The VEM, a parameter not yet commonly established in phoniatric diagnostics, was calculated from area and shape of the VRP to be compared with the dysphonia severity index (DSI) concerning diagnostic suitability.
Results: All polyps were completely excised. Three months postoperatively, mucosal wave propagation had recovered. All subjective and most objective acoustic and aerodynamic parameters showed highly significant improvement. The VHI-9i-score decreased from 15 ± 8 to 6 ± 7 points. The average total vocal range extended by 4 ± 5 semitones, the mean speaking pitch decreased by 1 ± 2 semitones. The DSI increased on average from 2.6 ± 2.1 to 4.0 ± 2.2, VEM from 83 ± 28 to 107 ± 21 (P < 0.01). VEM and DSI correlated significantly with each other (rs = 0.65; P < 0.01).
Conclusion: Phonomicrosurgery of VFP is an objectively and subjectively satisfactory therapy for voice improvement. The VEM represents a comprehensible and easy-to-use unidimensional measure for objective VRP evaluation. This positive measure of vocal function seems to be a compelling diagnostic addition for objective quantification of vocal performance.
Keywords: Phonomicrosurgery; Videolaryngostroboscopy; Vocal extent measure; Vocal fold polyp; Vocal function.
Copyright © 2017 The Voice Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Efficacy of Phonosurgery, Logopedic Voice Treatment and Vocal Pedagogy in Common Voice Problems of Singers.Adv Ther. 2018 Jul;35(7):1069-1086. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0725-x. Epub 2018 Jun 15. Adv Ther. 2018. PMID: 29949040 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of microsurgery in Reinke's oedema evaluated by traditional voice assessment integrated with the Vocal Extent Measure (VEM).Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2018 Jun;38(3):194-203. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-1544. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2018. PMID: 29984795 Free PMC article.
-
Phonomicrosurgery in Vocal Fold Nodules: Quantification of Outcomes in Professional and Non-Professional Voice Users.Med Probl Perform Art. 2017 Dec;32(4):187-194. doi: 10.21091/mppa.2017.4035. Med Probl Perform Art. 2017. PMID: 29231951 Clinical Trial.
-
Is voice therapy effective for the treatment of dysphonic patients with benign vocal fold lesions?Auris Nasus Larynx. 2018 Aug;45(4):661-666. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Aug 31. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2018. PMID: 28844607 Review.
-
Recommended Protocols for Instrumental Assessment of Voice: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Expert Panel to Develop a Protocol for Instrumental Assessment of Vocal Function.Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Aug 6;27(3):887-905. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0009. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018. PMID: 29955816 Review.
Cited by
-
Efficacy of Phonosurgery, Logopedic Voice Treatment and Vocal Pedagogy in Common Voice Problems of Singers.Adv Ther. 2018 Jul;35(7):1069-1086. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0725-x. Epub 2018 Jun 15. Adv Ther. 2018. PMID: 29949040 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Validation and Classification of the 9-Item Voice Handicap Index (VHI-9i).J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 28;10(15):3325. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153325. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34362112 Free PMC article.
-
Monitoring the Outcome of Phonosurgery and Vocal Exercises with Established and New Diagnostic Tools.Biomed Res Int. 2020 Jan 23;2020:4208189. doi: 10.1155/2020/4208189. eCollection 2020. Biomed Res Int. 2020. PMID: 32090091 Free PMC article.
-
Pathology-Related Influences on the VEM: Three Years' Experience since Implementation of a New Parameter in Phoniatric Voice Diagnostics.Biomed Res Int. 2020 Dec 21;2020:5309508. doi: 10.1155/2020/5309508. eCollection 2020. Biomed Res Int. 2020. PMID: 33506007 Free PMC article.
-
A comparison of Dysphonia Severity Index and Acoustic Voice Quality Index measures in differentiating normal and dysphonic voices.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Apr;275(4):949-958. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-4903-x. Epub 2018 Feb 13. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018. PMID: 29442165
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources