Insights Into the Evolution of Chemoreceptor Genes Superfamily in Tyrophagus putrescentiae (Acari: Acaridae)
- PMID: 27113112
- DOI: 10.1093/jme/tjv257
Insights Into the Evolution of Chemoreceptor Genes Superfamily in Tyrophagus putrescentiae (Acari: Acaridae)
Retraction in
-
Retraction.J Med Entomol. 2017 Jan;54(1):249. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjw180. Epub 2016 Nov 3. J Med Entomol. 2017. PMID: 28082656 No abstract available.
Abstract
All living organisms, including animals, plants, fungi, and bacteria, use the olfactory system to recognize chemicals or pheromone from their environment. Insects detect a volatile substance using odorant receptors (ORs) or gustatory receptors (GRs) and ionotropic receptors (IRs). The gene families of the olfactory system in Acari are still not clear. In this study, we identified seven ORs, one GR, and five IRs from the transcriptome of the storage mite, Tyrophagus putrescentiae Schrank. No olfactory coreceptor was found in this transcriptome. Phylogenetic analysis of these gene families with other Arthropoda species revealed the conservation of carbon dioxide receptors in all tested flying insects and T. putrescentiae Most of these ORs and GRs were unique to three mosquitoes (Anopheles gambiae Giles, Culex quinquefasciatus Say, and Aedes aegypti L.), Ixodes scapularis Say and Pediculus humanus L., indicating their involvement in specific aspects of both gustatory and olfactory perception. Some clades contained receptors obtained from all tested insect vector species, indicating a degree of conservation among some vector-dependent OR lineages. IRs family was a highly dynamic and independent original of the chemoreceptor genes subfamily. Our findings would make it possible for future research on the chemosensory recognition mechanism in Acari.
Keywords: OR; gustatory receptor; ionotropic receptor; olfactory system.
© The Authors 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Comment in
-
Comment on Qu et al. 2016.J Med Entomol. 2017 Jan;54(1):1-2. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjw152. Epub 2016 Nov 3. J Med Entomol. 2017. PMID: 28082623 No abstract available.
-
Response to Dr. Robertson's Letter to the Editor.J Med Entomol. 2017 Jan;54(1):3. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjw154. Epub 2016 Nov 3. J Med Entomol. 2017. PMID: 28082624 No abstract available.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources