Sexual Orientation: Categories or Continuum? Commentary on Bailey et al. (2016)
- PMID: 27113561
- DOI: 10.1177/1529100616637618
Sexual Orientation: Categories or Continuum? Commentary on Bailey et al. (2016)
Abstract
Bailey et al. (2016) have provided an excellent, state-of-the-art overview that is a major contribution to our understanding of sexual orientation. However, whereas Bailey and his coauthors have examined the physiological, behavioral, and self-report data of sexual orientation and see categories, I see a sexual and romantic continuum. After noting several objections concerning the limitations of the review and methodological shortcomings characteristic of sexual-orientation research in general, I present evidence from research investigating in-between sexualities to support an alternative, continuum-based perspective regarding the nature of sexual orientation for both women and men. A continuum conceptualization has potential implications for investigating the prevalence of nonheterosexuals, sexual-orientation differences in gender nonconformity, causes of sexual orientation, and political issues.
Keywords: gay/lesbian; recruitment; romantic indicators; sexual continuum; sexual orientation.
© The Author(s) 2016.
Comment on
-
Sexual Orientation, Controversy, and Science.Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2016 Sep;17(2):45-101. doi: 10.1177/1529100616637616. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2016. PMID: 27113562 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
