Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May 19;371(1694):20150275.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0275.

Ecological and socio-economic functions across tropical land use systems after rainforest conversion

Affiliations

Ecological and socio-economic functions across tropical land use systems after rainforest conversion

Jochen Drescher et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Tropical lowland rainforests are increasingly threatened by the expansion of agriculture and the extraction of natural resources. In Jambi Province, Indonesia, the interdisciplinary EFForTS project focuses on the ecological and socio-economic dimensions of rainforest conversion to jungle rubber agroforests and monoculture plantations of rubber and oil palm. Our data confirm that rainforest transformation and land use intensification lead to substantial losses in biodiversity and related ecosystem functions, such as decreased above- and below-ground carbon stocks. Owing to rapid step-wise transformation from forests to agroforests to monoculture plantations and renewal of each plantation type every few decades, the converted land use systems are continuously dynamic, thus hampering the adaptation of animal and plant communities. On the other hand, agricultural rainforest transformation systems provide increased income and access to education, especially for migrant smallholders. Jungle rubber and rubber monocultures are associated with higher financial land productivity but lower financial labour productivity compared to oil palm, which influences crop choice: smallholders that are labour-scarce would prefer oil palm while land-scarce smallholders would prefer rubber. Collecting long-term data in an interdisciplinary context enables us to provide decision-makers and stakeholders with scientific insights to facilitate the reconciliation between economic interests and ecological sustainability in tropical agricultural landscapes.

Keywords: EFForTS; agroforestry; biodiversity and ecosystem function; deforestation; jungle rubber; oil palm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Conceptual approach of the EFForTS project. EFForTS combines research on environmental processes, biota and ecosystems, and human dimensions to understand the drivers and consequences of current agricultural development in Jambi Province (Indonesia).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Location of EFForTS study sites in Sumatra (a,b) and Jambi Province (c,d). Socio-economic surveys are carried out all over Jambi Province (c), while the core plot design is located in two landscapes near to Bukit Duabelas National Park and Harapan Rainforest (d).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Average monthly temperature and rainfall at Sulthan Thaha Airport, Jambi City, from 1991 to 2011 (Sulthan Thaha Airport station). The relation of average monthly rainfall (solid and striped blue) to average monthly temperature (red line) illustrates Jambi's humid climate, with mean monthly rainfall above 100 mm throughout the year.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Land cover in Jambi Province from 1990 to 2013. Data were obtained by a series of Landsat imageries with spatial resolution of 30 × 30 m. The entire area of Jambi Province was used as reference. Degraded land (brown): shrubs, bare land, burnt areas; others (black): settlements, water bodies, fishpond.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Environmental (blue), ecological (green) and socio-economic (yellow) differences among rainforest (F), jungle rubber (J), rubber (R), and oil palm (O) plantations. Three outliners are not shown: (k) 7100 rubber labour hours, (l) –52.2 and –25.6 oil palm gross margin/labour. Letters indicate significant differences between land use systems ((a–i) ANOVA, Tukey's HSD test, p < 0.05; (j–l) Kruskal–Wallis/Kruskalmc test, p < 0.05) (for details, see the electronic supplementary material).

References

    1. Zhang X, Zwiers FW, Hegerl GC, Lambert H, Gillet NP, Solomon S, Stott PA, Nozawa T. 2007. Detection of human influence on twentieth-century precipitation trends. Nature 448, 461–465. (10.1038/nature06025) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gibbs HK, Ruesch AS, Achard F, Clayton MK, Holmgren P, Ramankutty N, Foley JA. 2010. Tropical forests were the primary source of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 16 732–16 737. (10.1073/pnas.0910275107) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brose U, Hillebrand H. 2016. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in dynamic landscapes. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20150267 (10.1098/rstb.2015.0267) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Foley JA, et al. 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science 309, 570–574. (10.1126/science.1111772) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dirzo R, Raven PH. 2003. Global state of biodiversity and loss. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 28, 137–167. (10.1146/annurev.ebergy.28.050302.105532) - DOI

Publication types