Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1989 Feb;21(1):69-84.
doi: 10.1007/BF02297348.

An epidemiological model of rinderpest. II. Simulations of the behaviour of rinderpest virus in populations

Affiliations

An epidemiological model of rinderpest. II. Simulations of the behaviour of rinderpest virus in populations

P B Rossiter et al. Trop Anim Health Prod. 1989 Feb.

Abstract

Fixed parameters for different hypothetical strains of rinderpest virus (RV) and different susceptible populations are described together with details of their derivation. Simulations were then carried out in a computer model to determine the effects that varying these parameters would have on the behaviour of RV in the different populations. The results indicated that virulent strains of RV are more likely to behave in epidemic fashion whereas milder strains tend towards persistence and the establishment of endemicity. High herd immunity levels prevent virus transmission and low herd immunity levels encourage epidemic transmission. Intermediate levels of immunity assist the establishment of endemicity. The virus is able to persist in large populations for longer than in small populations. Different vaccination strategies were also investigated. In areas where vaccination is inefficient annual vaccination of all stock may be the best policy for inducing high levels of herd immunity. In endemic areas and in herds recovering from epidemics the prevalence of clinically affected animals may be very low. In these situations veterinary officers are more likely to find clinical cases by examining cattle for mouth lesions rather than by checking for diarrhoea or high mortalities.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Int J Epidemiol. 1983 Sep;12(3):332-9 - PubMed
    1. J Hyg (Lond). 1967 Dec;65(4):537-45 - PubMed
    1. Trop Anim Health Prod. 1989 Feb;21(1):59-68 - PubMed
    1. Int J Epidemiol. 1983 Sep;12(3):263-6 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1982 Feb 26;215(4536):1053-60 - PubMed