Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Apr 25:20:12.
doi: 10.1186/s40824-016-0058-2. eCollection 2016.

3-dimensional bioprinting for tissue engineering applications

Affiliations
Review

3-dimensional bioprinting for tissue engineering applications

Bon Kang Gu et al. Biomater Res. .

Abstract

The 3-dimensional (3D) printing technologies, referred to as additive manufacturing (AM) or rapid prototyping (RP), have acquired reputation over the past few years for art, architectural modeling, lightweight machines, and tissue engineering applications. Among these applications, tissue engineering field using 3D printing has attracted the attention from many researchers. 3D bioprinting has an advantage in the manufacture of a scaffold for tissue engineering applications, because of rapid-fabrication, high-precision, and customized-production, etc. In this review, we will introduce the principles and the current state of the 3D bioprinting methods. Focusing on some of studies that are being current application for biomedical and tissue engineering fields using printed 3D scaffolds.

Keywords: 3D bioprinting; 3D scaffold; Additive manufacturing; Tissue engineering.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The 3D printing process. (step-by-step)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schematics of various 3D bioprinting for tissue engineering applications; a Vat photopolymerization, b Fused filament fabrication, c Selective laser sintering, d Inkjet 3D printing

References

    1. Hull CW. Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography. US patent: 4,575,330. 1986.
    1. Kruth JP, Leu MC, Nakagawa T. Progress in additive manufacturing and rapid prototyping. CIRP Ann-Manuf Techn. 1998;47:525–40. doi: 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63240-5. - DOI
    1. Melchels FPW, Domingos MAN, Kleina TJ, Maldaa J, Bartoloc PJ, Hutmacher DW. Additive manufacturing of tissues and organs. Prog Polym Sci. 2012;37:1079–104. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.11.007. - DOI
    1. Bak D. Rapid prototyping or rapid production? 3D printing processes move industry towards the latter. Assembly Autom. 2003;23:340–5. doi: 10.1108/01445150310501190. - DOI
    1. Campbell TA, Ivanova OS. 3D printing of multifunctional nanocomposites. Nano Today. 2013;8:119–20. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2012.12.002. - DOI