Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Apr;5(2):133-40.
doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2015.06.01.

Living donor liver transplantation in the USA

Affiliations
Review

Living donor liver transplantation in the USA

Peter T W Kim et al. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Living donor liver transplant (LDLT) accounts for a small volume of the transplants in the USA. Due to the current liver allocation system based on the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), LDLT has a unique role in providing life-saving transplantation for patients with low MELD scores and significant complications from portal hypertension, as well as select patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Donor safety is paramount and has been a topic of much discussion in the transplant community as well as the general media. The donor risk appears to be low overall, with a favorable long-term quality of life. The latest trend has been a gradual shift from right-lobe grafts to left-lobe grafts to reduce donor risk, provided that the left lobe can provide adequate liver volume for the recipient.

Keywords: Donor risk; left-lobe graft; liver transplantation; living donor; mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trends in the numbers of new patients on the liver transplant wait list, deceased donor liver transplants, and living donor liver transplants in the USA from 1997 to 2013.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Geographic map showing the 11 regions of the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) in the USA.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The number of deceased donor liver transplants (DDLTs) and living donor liver transplants (LDLTs) performed in 2013 by United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) region, based on data from UNOS.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The probability of death for patients on the liver transplant waiting list, patients who undergo living donor liver transplant (LDLT) at centers with minimal experience, patients who undergo deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT), and patients who undergo LDLT at experienced centers. The data indicate that from years 1 to 4, more patients who undergo LDLT at experienced centers are alive compared with all other categories. Reprinted with permission from Berg et al., 2007 (20).

References

    1. Strong RW, Lynch SV, Ong TH, et al. Successful liver transplantation from a living donor to her son. N Engl J Med 1990;322:1505-7. - PubMed
    1. Broelsch CE, Whitington PF, Emond JC, et al. Liver transplantation in children from living related donors. Surgical techniques and results. Ann Surg 1991;214:428-37; discussion 37-9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hashikura Y, Makuuchi M, Kawasaki S, et al. Successful living-related partial liver transplantation to an adult patient. Lancet 1994;343:1233-4. - PubMed
    1. Emond JC, Renz JF, Ferrell LD, et al. Functional analysis of grafts from living donors. Implications for the treatment of older recipients. Ann Surg 1996;224:544-52; discussion 552-4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ben-Haim M, Emre S, Fishbein TM, et al. Critical graft size in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: impact of the recipient’s disease. Liver Transpl 2001;7:948-53. - PubMed