Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 Apr 26;4(4):CD002929.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002929.pub3.

Disposable surgical face masks for preventing surgical wound infection in clean surgery

Marina Vincent  1 , Peggy Edwards
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Disposable surgical face masks for preventing surgical wound infection in clean surgery

Marina Vincent et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Surgical face masks were originally developed to contain and filter droplets containing microorganisms expelled from the mouth and nasopharynx of healthcare workers during surgery, thereby providing protection for the patient. However, there are several ways in which surgical face masks could potentially contribute to contamination of the surgical wound, e.g. by incorrect wear or by leaking air from the side of the mask due to poor string tension.

Objectives: To determine whether the wearing of disposable surgical face masks by the surgical team during clean surgery reduces postoperative surgical wound infection.

Search methods: In December 2015, for this seventh update, we searched: The Cochrane Wounds Specialised Register; The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations); Ovid EMBASE and EBSCO CINAHL. We also searched the bibliographies of all retrieved and relevant publications. There were no restrictions with respect to language, date of publication or study setting.

Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing the use of disposable surgical masks with the use of no mask.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors extracted data independently.

Main results: We included three trials, involving a total of 2106 participants. There was no statistically significant difference in infection rates between the masked and unmasked group in any of the trials. We identified no new trials for this latest update.

Authors' conclusions: From the limited results it is unclear whether the wearing of surgical face masks by members of the surgical team has any impact on surgical wound infection rates for patients undergoing clean surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Marina Vincent: none known. Peggy Edwards: none known.

Figures

1
1
Methodological quality graph: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included studies.
2
2
Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Masks versus no masks, Outcome 1 Wound infection.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

References

References to studies included in this review

Chamberlain 1984 {published data only}
    1. Chamberlain G, Houang E. Trial of the use of masks in the gynaecological operating theatre. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 1984;66(6):432‐3. - PMC - PubMed
Tunevall 1991 {published data only}
    1. Tunevall T. Postoperative wound infections and surgical face masks: a controlled study. World Journal of Surgery 1991;15(3):383‐8. - PubMed
Webster 2010 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Webster J, Croger S, Lister C, Doidge M, Terry M, Jones I. Use of face masks by non‐scrubbed operating room staff: a randomized controlled trial. ANZ Journal of Surgery 2010;80(3):169‐73. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Alwitry 2002 {published data only}
    1. Alwitry A, Jackson E, Chen H, Holden R. The use of surgical facemasks during cataract surgery: is it necessary?. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2002;86(9):975‐7. - PMC - PubMed
Berger 1993 {published data only}
    1. Berger S, Kramer M, Nagar H, Finkelstein A, Frimmerman A, Miller H. Effect of surgical mask position on bacterial contamination of the operative field. Journal of Hospital Infection 1993;23:51‐4. - PubMed
Ha'eri 1980 {published data only}
    1. Ha'eri G, Wiley A. The efficacy of standard surgical face masks: an investigation using 'tracer particles'. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 1980;148:160‐2. - PubMed
Hubble 1996 {published data only}
    1. Hubble M, Weale A, Perez J, Bowker K, MacGowen A, Bannister G. Clothing in laminar‐flow operating theatres. Journal of Hospital Infection 1996;32(1):1‐7. - PubMed
McGovern 2013 {published data only}
    1. McGovern PD, Albrecht M, Khan SK, Muller SD, Reed MR. The influence of surgical hoods and togas on airborne particle concentration at the surgical site: an experimental study. Journal of Orthopaedic Science 2013;18:1027‐30. - PubMed
McLure 1998 {published data only}
    1. McLure H, Talboys C, Yentis S, Azadian B. Surgical face masks and downward dispersal of bacteria. Anaesthesia 1998;53(7):624‐6. - PubMed
Mitchell 1991 {published data only}
    1. Mitchell N, Hunt S. Surgical face masks in modern operating rooms ‐ a costly and unnecessary ritual?. Journal of Hospital Infection 1991;18:239‐42. - PubMed
Moore 2001 {unpublished data only}
    1. Moore A, Klimach OE. Face masks or visors?. Unpublished study.
Norman 1995 {published data only}
    1. Norman A. A comparison of face masks and visors for the scrub team. British Journal of Theatre Nursing 1995;5(2):10‐3. - PubMed
Orr 1981 {published data only}
    1. Orr N. Is a mask necessary in the operating theatre?. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 1981;63:390‐2. - PMC - PubMed
Ritter 1975 {published data only}
    1. Ritter M, Eitzen H, French M, Hart J. The operating room environment as affected by people and the surgical face mask. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 1975;111:147‐50. - PubMed
Ruthman 1984 {published data only}
    1. Ruthman J, Hendricksen D, Miller R, Quigg D. Effect of cap and mask on infection rates. Illinois Medical Journal 1984;165(6):397‐9. - PubMed
Salassa 2014 {published data only}
    1. Salassa TE, Swiontkowski MF. Surgical attire and the operating room: role in infection prevention. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 2014;96:1485‐92. - PubMed
Sjol 2002 {published data only}
    1. Sjol A, Kelbaek H. Is use of surgical caps and masks obsolete during percutaneous heart catheterization?. Ugeskrift for Laeger 2002;164(12):1673‐5. - PubMed
Tunevall 1992 {published data only}
    1. Tunevall T, Jorbeck H. Influence of wearing masks on the density of airborne bacteria in the vicinity of the surgical wound. European Journal of Surgery 1992;158:263‐6. - PubMed

Additional references

AfPP 2007
    1. Pirie S, Beesley J, Vernon T. Standards and Recommendations for Safe Perioperative Practice. England: Association for Perioperative Practitioners, 2007.
Altman 1991
    1. Altman D. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. 1st Edition. London: Chapman Hall, 1991.
AORN 1998
    1. American Operating Room Nurses. Standards, Recommendations Practice and Guidelines. Colorado: American Operating Room Nurses, 1998.
Belkin 1996
    1. Belkin N. A century after their introduction, are surgical masks necessary?. American Operating Room Nurses Journal 1996;64(4):602‐7. - PubMed
Belkin 1997
    1. Belkin N. The evolution of the surgical mask: filtering efficiency versus effectiveness. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 1997;18(1):49‐57. - PubMed
Garner 1996
    1. Garner JS. Guideline for isolation precautions in hospital. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 1996;17(1):53‐80. - PubMed
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, on behalf of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group and the Cochrane Bias Methods Group (Editors). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Lefebvre 2011
    1. Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J, on behalf of the Cochrane Information Retrieval Methods Group. Chapter 6: Searching for studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Mangram 1999
    1. Mangram A, Horan T, Pearson M, Silver L, Jarvis W. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 1999;20(4):247‐78. - PubMed
Perry 1994
    1. Perry AG, Potter PA. Clinical Nursing Skills and Techniques. St Louis: Mosby, 1994.
Plowman 2000
    1. Plowman R, Graves N, Griffin M. The Socio‐economic Burden of Hospital Acquired Infection. London: Public Health Service Laboratory, 2000.
RevMan 2014 [Computer program]
    1. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
Schulz 2010
    1. Schulz K, Altman DG, Moher D, for the CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010;340:c332. - PMC - PubMed
Schweizer 1976
    1. Schweizer RT. Mask wiggling as a potential cause of wound contamination. Lancet 1976;2:1129‐30. - PubMed
SIGN 2015
    1. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Search filters. http://www.sign.ac.uk/methodology/filters.html#random (accessed 06 April 2016).
UHS 2000
    1. Universal Hospital Supplies. Personal correspondence 2000.
Weber 1993
    1. Weber A, Willeke K, Marchioni R, Myojo T, McKay R, Donnelly J, et al. Aerosol penetration and leakage characteristics of masks used in the health care industry. American Journal of Infection Control 1993;21(4):167‐73. - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

Lipp 2014
    1. Lipp A, Edwards P. Disposable surgical facemasks for preventing surgical wound infection in clean surgery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002929.pub2] - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources