Remote Patient Monitoring via Non-Invasive Digital Technologies: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 27116181
- PMCID: PMC5240011
- DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2016.0051
Remote Patient Monitoring via Non-Invasive Digital Technologies: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Background: We conducted a systematic literature review to identify key trends associated with remote patient monitoring (RPM) via noninvasive digital technologies over the last decade.
Materials and methods: A search was conducted in EMBASE and Ovid MEDLINE. Citations were screened for relevance against predefined selection criteria based on the PICOTS (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes, Timeframe, and Study Design) format. We included studies published between January 1, 2005 and September 15, 2015 that used RPM via noninvasive digital technology (smartphones/personal digital assistants [PDAs], wearables, biosensors, computerized systems, or multiple components of the formerly mentioned) in evaluating health outcomes compared to standard of care or another technology. Studies were quality appraised according to Critical Appraisal Skills Programme.
Results: Of 347 articles identified, 62 met the selection criteria. Most studies were randomized control trials with older adult populations, small sample sizes, and limited follow-up. There was a trend toward multicomponent interventions (n = 26), followed by smartphones/PDAs (n = 12), wearables (n = 11), biosensor devices (n = 7), and computerized systems (n = 6). Another key trend was the monitoring of chronic conditions, including respiratory (23%), weight management (17%), metabolic (18%), and cardiovascular diseases (16%). Although substantial diversity in health-related outcomes was noted, studies predominantly reported positive findings.
Conclusions: This review will help decision makers develop a better understanding of the current landscape of peer-reviewed literature, demonstrating the utility of noninvasive RPM in various patient populations. Future research is needed to determine the effectiveness of RPM via noninvasive digital technologies in delivering patient healthcare benefits and the feasibility of large-scale implementation.
Keywords: e-health; m-health; telehealth; telemedicine.
Conflict of interest statement
Statement A.V. is a postdoctoral student from Jefferson College of Population Health and a US HEOR Fellow at Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. M.T. is a postdoctoral student from Scott & White Health Plan, University of Texas at Austin and a US HEOR Fellow at Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. S.A. and M.A. are employees of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation provided funding for this work.
Figures



References
-
- HRSA. What is Telehealth. Available at www.hrsa.gov/healthit/toolbox/RuralHealthITtoolbox/Telehealth/whatistele... (last accessed December4, 2015)
-
- University of Miami. Telehealth definitions. Available at http://telehealth.med.miami.edu/what-is-telehealth (last accessed October15, 2015)
-
- The National Alliance for Health Information Technology Report to the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology on Defining Key Health Information Technology Terms, released on April 28, 2008. LeadingAge.org/CAST
-
- LeadingAge CAST. Telehealth and Remote Patient Monitoring for LongTerm and PostAcute Care: A Primer and Provider Selection Guide 2015. Washington, DC: LeadingAge Center for Aging Services Technologies, 2015
-
- Steinhubl SR, Muse ED, Topol EJ. Can mobile health technologies transform health care? JAMA 2013;310:2395–2396 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous