Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016;49(4):e5301.
doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20165301. Epub 2016 Apr 26.

Impact of specimen adequacy on the assessment of renal allograft biopsy specimens

Affiliations

Impact of specimen adequacy on the assessment of renal allograft biopsy specimens

S Cimen et al. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2016.

Abstract

The Banff classification was introduced to achieve uniformity in the assessment of renal allograft biopsies. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of specimen adequacy on the Banff classification. All renal allograft biopsies obtained between July 2010 and June 2012 for suspicion of acute rejection were included. Pre-biopsy clinical data on suspected diagnosis and time from renal transplantation were provided to a nephropathologist who was blinded to the original pathological report. Second pathological readings were compared with the original to assess agreement stratified by specimen adequacy. Cohen's kappa test and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical analyses. Forty-nine specimens were reviewed. Among these specimens, 81.6% were classified as adequate, 6.12% as minimal, and 12.24% as unsatisfactory. The agreement analysis among the first and second readings revealed a kappa value of 0.97. Full agreement between readings was found in 75% of the adequate specimens, 66.7 and 50% for minimal and unsatisfactory specimens, respectively. There was no agreement between readings in 5% of the adequate specimens and 16.7% of the unsatisfactory specimens. For the entire sample full agreement was found in 71.4%, partial agreement in 20.4% and no agreement in 8.2% of the specimens. Statistical analysis using Fisher's exact test yielded a P value above 0.25 showing that - probably due to small sample size - the results were not statistically significant. Specimen adequacy may be a determinant of a diagnostic agreement in renal allograft specimen assessment. While additional studies including larger case numbers are required to further delineate the impact of specimen adequacy on the reliability of histopathological assessments, specimen quality must be considered during clinical decision making while dealing with biopsy reports based on minimal or unsatisfactory specimens.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Frequency (%) of histopathological diagnoses from renal allograft biopsy specimens reported by the nephropathologist. IgA, immunoglobulin A.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Percentage of full agreement in biopsy specimens stratified by specimen adequacy (quality of biopsy).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bates WD, Davies DR, Welsh K, Gray DW, Fuggle SV, Morris PJ. An evaluation of the Banff classification of early renal allograft biopsies and correlation with outcome. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1999;14:2364–2369. doi: 10.1093/ndt/14.10.2364. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gray DW, Richardson A, Hughes D, Fuggle S, Dunnill M, Higgins R, et al. A prospective, randomized, blind comparison of three biopsy techniques in the management of patients after renal transplantation. Transplantation. 1992;53:1226–1232. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199206000-00011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Solez K, Axelsen RA, Benediktsson H, Burdick JF, Cohen AH, Colvin RB, et al. International standardization of criteria for the histologic diagnosis of renal allograft rejection: the Banff working classification of kidney transplant pathology. Kidney Int. 1993;44:411–422. doi: 10.1038/ki.1993.259. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mengel M, Sis B, Halloran PF. SWOT analysis of Banff: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of the international Banff consensus process and classification system for renal allograft pathology. Am J Transplant. 2007;7:2221–2226. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01924.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mengel M, Sis B, Haas M, Colvin RB, Halloran PF, Racusen LC, et al. Banff 2011 Meeting report: new concepts in antibody-mediated rejection. Am J Transplant. 2012;12:563–570. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03926.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed