Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Aug;30(8):1648-71.
doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.104. Epub 2016 Apr 28.

European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management and avoidance of adverse events of treatment in chronic myeloid leukaemia

Affiliations
Review

European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management and avoidance of adverse events of treatment in chronic myeloid leukaemia

J L Steegmann et al. Leukemia. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

Most reports on chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) focus on efficacy, particularly on molecular response and outcome. In contrast, adverse events (AEs) are often reported as infrequent, minor, tolerable and manageable, but they are increasingly important as therapy is potentially lifelong and multiple TKIs are available. For this reason, the European LeukemiaNet panel for CML management recommendations presents an exhaustive and critical summary of AEs emerging during CML treatment, to assist their understanding, management and prevention. There are five major conclusions. First, the main purpose of CML treatment is the antileukemic effect. Suboptimal management of AEs must not compromise this first objective. Second, most patients will have AEs, usually early, mostly mild to moderate, and which will resolve spontaneously or are easily controlled by simple means. Third, reduction or interruption of treatment must only be done if optimal management of the AE cannot be accomplished in other ways, and frequent monitoring is needed to detect resolution of the AE as early as possible. Fourth, attention must be given to comorbidities and drug interactions, and to new events unrelated to TKIs that are inevitable during such a prolonged treatment. Fifth, some TKI-related AEs have emerged which were not predicted or detected in earlier studies, maybe because of suboptimal attention to or absence from the preclinical data. Overall, imatinib has demonstrated a good long-term safety profile, though recent findings suggest underestimation of symptom severity by physicians. Second and third generation TKIs have shown higher response rates, but have been associated with unexpected problems, some of which could be irreversible. We hope these recommendations will help to minimise adverse events, and we believe that an optimal management of them will be rewarded by better TKI compliance and thus better CML outcomes, together with better quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors declare the following relationships with pharmaceutical companies: Amgen- receipt of honoraria (GR); Ariad—receipt of honoraria: (JLS, MB, MaB, VG-G, DWK, HJK, PLC, DM, DR, GR and SS) and research funding (JLS, LFC, VG-G, AH, DWK, PLC and GR); Bristol–Myers–Squibb—receipt of honoraria (JLS, MB, MaB, LFC, VG-G, AH, DWK, HJK, PLC, DM, KP, DR, GR, SS, RH and REC), research funding (JLS, LFC, VG-G, DWK, JM, KP, GR, SS and REC) and nonfinancial support (JM); MSD- research support (AH); Novartis—receipt of honoraria (JLS, MB, MaB, LFC, VG-G, DWK, HJK, PLC, DM, KP, DR, GR, SS and REC), research funding (JLS, LFC, VG-G, AH, DWK, JM, KP, GR, SS, RH and REC) and nonfinancial support (JM); ILYANG—receipt of honoraria (DWK) and research funding (DWK); Pfizer-receipt of honoraria (JLS, MB, MaB, LFC, VG-G, DWK, HJK, PLC, DM, KP, DR, GR, SS and REC) and research funding (JLS, LFC, VG-G, AH, DWK, KP, GR and REC); Roche—receipt of honoraria (GR); Sanofi-receipt of honoraria (REC) and research funding (REC); Teva—receipt of honoraria (HJK).

Comment in

References

    1. O'Brien SG, Guilhot F, Larson RA, Gathmann I, Baccarani M, Cervantes F et al. Imatinib compared with interferon and low-dose cytarabine for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 994–1004. - PubMed
    1. Saglio G, Kim DW, Issaragrisil S, le Coutre P, Etienne G, Lobo C et al. Nilotinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 2251–2259. - PubMed
    1. Larson RA, Hochhaus A, Hughes TP, Clark RE, Etienne G, Kim DW et al. Nilotinib vs imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: ENESTnd 3-year follow-up. Leukemia 2012; 26: 2197–2203. - PubMed
    1. Kantarjian H, Shah NP, Hochhaus A, Cortes J, Shah S, Ayala M et al. Dasatinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 2260–2270. - PubMed
    1. Kantarjian HM, Shah NP, Cortes JE, Baccarani M, Agarwal MB, Undurraga MS et al. Dasatinib or imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: 2-year follow-up from a randomized phase 3 trial (DASISION). Blood 2012; 119: 1123–1129. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances