European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management and avoidance of adverse events of treatment in chronic myeloid leukaemia
- PMID: 27121688
- PMCID: PMC4991363
- DOI: 10.1038/leu.2016.104
European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management and avoidance of adverse events of treatment in chronic myeloid leukaemia
Abstract
Most reports on chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) focus on efficacy, particularly on molecular response and outcome. In contrast, adverse events (AEs) are often reported as infrequent, minor, tolerable and manageable, but they are increasingly important as therapy is potentially lifelong and multiple TKIs are available. For this reason, the European LeukemiaNet panel for CML management recommendations presents an exhaustive and critical summary of AEs emerging during CML treatment, to assist their understanding, management and prevention. There are five major conclusions. First, the main purpose of CML treatment is the antileukemic effect. Suboptimal management of AEs must not compromise this first objective. Second, most patients will have AEs, usually early, mostly mild to moderate, and which will resolve spontaneously or are easily controlled by simple means. Third, reduction or interruption of treatment must only be done if optimal management of the AE cannot be accomplished in other ways, and frequent monitoring is needed to detect resolution of the AE as early as possible. Fourth, attention must be given to comorbidities and drug interactions, and to new events unrelated to TKIs that are inevitable during such a prolonged treatment. Fifth, some TKI-related AEs have emerged which were not predicted or detected in earlier studies, maybe because of suboptimal attention to or absence from the preclinical data. Overall, imatinib has demonstrated a good long-term safety profile, though recent findings suggest underestimation of symptom severity by physicians. Second and third generation TKIs have shown higher response rates, but have been associated with unexpected problems, some of which could be irreversible. We hope these recommendations will help to minimise adverse events, and we believe that an optimal management of them will be rewarded by better TKI compliance and thus better CML outcomes, together with better quality of life.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors declare the following relationships with pharmaceutical companies: Amgen- receipt of honoraria (GR); Ariad—receipt of honoraria: (JLS, MB, MaB, VG-G, DWK, HJK, PLC, DM, DR, GR and SS) and research funding (JLS, LFC, VG-G, AH, DWK, PLC and GR); Bristol–Myers–Squibb—receipt of honoraria (JLS, MB, MaB, LFC, VG-G, AH, DWK, HJK, PLC, DM, KP, DR, GR, SS, RH and REC), research funding (JLS, LFC, VG-G, DWK, JM, KP, GR, SS and REC) and nonfinancial support (JM); MSD- research support (AH); Novartis—receipt of honoraria (JLS, MB, MaB, LFC, VG-G, DWK, HJK, PLC, DM, KP, DR, GR, SS and REC), research funding (JLS, LFC, VG-G, AH, DWK, JM, KP, GR, SS, RH and REC) and nonfinancial support (JM); ILYANG—receipt of honoraria (DWK) and research funding (DWK); Pfizer-receipt of honoraria (JLS, MB, MaB, LFC, VG-G, DWK, HJK, PLC, DM, KP, DR, GR, SS and REC) and research funding (JLS, LFC, VG-G, AH, DWK, KP, GR and REC); Roche—receipt of honoraria (GR); Sanofi-receipt of honoraria (REC) and research funding (REC); Teva—receipt of honoraria (HJK).
Comment in
-
Cardiologist's perspective to the European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management and avoidance of adverse events of treatment in chronic myeloid leukaemia.Leukemia. 2017 Mar;31(3):771-772. doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.336. Epub 2016 Dec 2. Leukemia. 2017. PMID: 27909345 No abstract available.
-
Reply to Constance et al.Leukemia. 2017 Mar;31(3):772-773. doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.337. Epub 2016 Dec 6. Leukemia. 2017. PMID: 27922619 No abstract available.
References
-
- O'Brien SG, Guilhot F, Larson RA, Gathmann I, Baccarani M, Cervantes F et al. Imatinib compared with interferon and low-dose cytarabine for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 994–1004. - PubMed
-
- Saglio G, Kim DW, Issaragrisil S, le Coutre P, Etienne G, Lobo C et al. Nilotinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 2251–2259. - PubMed
-
- Larson RA, Hochhaus A, Hughes TP, Clark RE, Etienne G, Kim DW et al. Nilotinib vs imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: ENESTnd 3-year follow-up. Leukemia 2012; 26: 2197–2203. - PubMed
-
- Kantarjian H, Shah NP, Hochhaus A, Cortes J, Shah S, Ayala M et al. Dasatinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 2260–2270. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical