Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2016 Jul;54(7):1907-1911.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.00132-16. Epub 2016 Apr 27.

Comparison of Culture-Based Methods for Identification of Colonization with Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in the Context of Cocolonization

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of Culture-Based Methods for Identification of Colonization with Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in the Context of Cocolonization

Meghan F Davis et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Jul.

Abstract

Two screening methods to detect staphylococcal colonization in humans were compared. Direct plating to CHROMagar (BD Diagnostics) was compared to a broth preenrichment followed by plating to Baird-Parker agar. The broth-enrichment method was comparable to CHROMagar for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureas (MRSA) detection, but the enrichment method was optimum for recovery of coagulase-positive Staphylococcus spp.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Protocols for the two culture-based methods (CHROMagar and broth enrichment) compared in this analysis. Additional incubation time (24 to 48 h) before reading of the inoculated agar media plates (CHROMagar or Baird-Parker) is not depicted but was comparable between the methods. For the broth-enrichment method, multiple colonies were selected from the blood agar plates based on distinct colony morphology, and these were subcultivated as needed before pure colony growth was inoculated onto Baird-Parker agar; this may result in an additional day or (rarely) days to complete the protocol.

References

    1. Davis MF, Iverson SA, Baron P, Vasse A, Silbergeld EK, Lautenbach E, Morris DO. 2012. Household transmission of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and other staphylococci. Lancet Infect Dis 12:703–716. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70156-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Davis MF, Baron P, Price LB, Williams DL, Jeyaseelan S, Hambleton IR, Diette GB, Breysse PN, McCormack MC. 2012. Dry collection and culture methods for recovery of methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains from indoor home environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:2474–2476. doi:10.1128/AEM.06886-11. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weese JS. 2007. Environmental surveillance for MRSA. Methods Mol Biol 391:201–208. doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-468-1_15. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Frank DN, Feazel LM, Bessesen MT, Price CS, Janoff EN, Pace NR. 2010. The human nasal microbiota and Staphylococcus aureus carriage. PLoS One 5:e10598. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010598. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Han Z, Lautenbach E, Fishman N, Nachamkin I. 2007. Evaluation of mannitol salt agar, CHROMagar Staph aureus and CHROMagar MRSA for detection of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from nasal swab specimens. J Med Microbiol 56:43–46. doi:10.1099/jmm.0.46777-0. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources