Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 Apr;95(17):e3462.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003462.

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Medical Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Obese Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Medical Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Obese Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Yong Yan et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Apr.

Abstract

The aim of the study is to compare Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery versus medical treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in obese patients.Bariatric surgery can achieve remission of T2DM in obese patients. RYGB surgery has been performed as one of the most common surgical treatment options for obese patients with T2DM, but the efficacy of RYGB surgery comparing with medical treatment alone has not been conclusively determined.A systematic literature search identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating RYGB surgery versus medical treatment for T2DM in obese patients was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database, and Cochrane Clinical Trials Registry. This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The primary outcome was T2DM remission. Additional analyses comprised hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, serum lipid level, blood pressure, medication use, and adverse events. Random-effects meta-analyses were calculated and presented as weighted odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).Six RCTs concerning 410 total obese T2DM patients were included. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 60 months. RYGB surgery was associated with a higher T2DM remission rate (OR: 76.37, 95% CI: 20.70-281.73, P < 0.001) and serum level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD: 0.24 mmol/L, 95% CI 0.18-0.30 mmol/L, P < 0.001) than medical treatment alone. HbA1c (MD: -1.25%, 95% CI: -1.88% to -0.63%, P < 0.001), BMI (MD: -6.54 kg/m, 95% CI: -9.28 to -3.80 kg/m, P < 0.001), waist circumference (MD: -15.60 cm, 95% CI: -18.21 to -13.00 cm, P < 0.001), triglyceride (MD: -0.87 mmol/L, 95% CI: -1.17 to -0.57 mmol/L, P < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD: -0.32 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.62 to -0.02 mmol/L, P = 0.04), systolic blood pressure (MD: -2.83 mm Hg, 95% CI: -4.88 to -0.78 mm Hg, P < 0.01) were lower after RYGB surgery. However, FPG (MD: -1.58 mmol/L, 95% CI: -3.58 to 0.41 mmol/L, P = 0.12), total cholesterol (MD: -0.40 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.92 to 0.12 mmol/L, P = 0.13), and diastolic blood pressure (MD: 0.28 mm Hg, 95% CI: -1.89 to 2.45 mm Hg, P = 0.80) were not significantly different between the 2 treatment groups. The medicine use and quality of life were solely improved in the surgical group. Nutritional deficiencies and anemia were noted more frequently in the RYGB group.RYGB surgery is superior to medical treatment for short- to medium-term remission of T2DM, improvement of metabolic condition, and cardiovascular risk factors. Further RCTs should address the safety and long-term benefits of RYGB surgery on obese patients with T2DM.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow diagram of included and excluded studies.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Forest plot of the type 2 diabetes mellitus remission rate after RYGB surgery compared to medical treatment. The remission rate was higher in the RYGB group than the medical group (OR: 76.37, 95% CI: 20.70–281.73, P < 0.001). CI = confidence interval, OR = odds ratio, RYGB = Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Forest plot of HbA1c (A) and FPG (B) level after RYGB surgery compared to medical treatment. The HbA1c level was lower in the RYGB group than the medical group (MD: –1.25, 95% CI: –1.88 to –0.63, P < 0.001). The FPG level was similar in RYGB and medical groups (MD: –1.58, 95% CI: –3.58 to 0.41, P = 0.12). CI = confidence interval, FPG = fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c, MD = mean difference, RYGB = Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Forest plot of BMI (A) and waist circumference (B) level after RYGB surgery compared to medical treatment. Both BMI (MD: –6.54, 95% CI: –9.28 to –3.80, P < 0.001) and waist circumference (MD: –15.60, 95% CI: –18.21 to –13.00, P < 0.001) were lower in the RYGB group than the medical group. BMI = body mass index, CI = confidence interval, MD = mean difference, RYGB = Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Forest plot of triglyceride (A), total cholesterol (B), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (C), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (D) after RYGB surgery compared to medical treatment. The levels of triglyceride (MD: –0.87, 95% CI: –1.17 to –0.57, P < 0.001) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD: –0.32, 95% CI: –0.62 to –0.02, P = 0.04) were lower in the RYGB group than the medical group. The total cholesterol level was similar in RYGB and medical groups (MD: –0.40, 95% CI: –0.92 to 0.12, P = 0.13). The high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.18–0.30, P < 0.001) level was higher in the RYGB group than the medical group. CI = confidence interval, MD = mean difference, RYGB = Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Forest plot of systolic blood pressure (A) and diastolic blood pressure (B) after RYGB surgery compared to medical treatment. The systolic blood pressure was lower in the RYGB group than the medical group (MD: –2.83, 95% CI: –4.88 to –0.78, P < 0.01). The diastolic blood pressure was similar in RYGB and medical groups (MD: 0.28, 95% CI: –1.89 to 2.45, P = 0.80). CI = confidence interval, MD = mean difference, RYGB = Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
Funnel plot of HbA1c for assessing publication bias. HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c.

References

    1. Finucane MM, Stevens GA, Cowan MJ, et al. National, regional, and global trends in body-mass index since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 960 country-years and 9.1 million participants. Lancet 2011; 377:557–567. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Skinner AC, Skelton JA. Prevalence and trends in obesity and severe obesity among children in the United States, 1999–2012. JAMA Pediatrics 2014; 168:561–566. - PubMed
    1. Bhutani J, Bhutani S. Worldwide burden of diabetes. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2014; 18:868–870. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Skrha J. Diabetes mellitus–a global pandemic. Keynote lecture presented at the Wonca conference in Prague in June 2013. Eur J Gen Pract 2014; 20:65–68. - PubMed
    1. Bell JA, Kivimaki M, Hamer M. Metabolically healthy obesity and risk of incident type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Obes Rev 2014; 15:504–515. - PMC - PubMed

Substances