Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Sep;30(9):483-8.
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000616.

Five-Year Outcome Analysis of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing a 2-Screw and a Single-Screw Cephalomedullary Nail

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Five-Year Outcome Analysis of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing a 2-Screw and a Single-Screw Cephalomedullary Nail

Josephine Berger-Groch et al. J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the radiological and functional outcome after fixation of intertrochanteric fractures (IF) using either an integrated 2-screw cephalomedullary nail [InterTan (IT); Smith & Nephew] or a single-screw device [Gamma3 (G3); Stryker] with a 5-year follow-up.

Design: Prospective, randomized.

Settings: A single-center study.

Patients: One hundred four patients with a mean age of 81.2 ± 9.2 years were included, 33 patients were available for the final 5-year follow-up, 63 patients died, and 8 patients were lost for follow-up.

Intervention: Internal fixation of intertrochaneteric femur fractures using a cephalomedullary nail with either a single screw or an integrated 2-screw system.

Main outcome measurements: Length of hospital stay, SF-36-questionnaire, Harris-Hip-Score, radiographs.

Results: SF-36 index at 6 months indicated that 93% of the IT group returned to their prefracture status compared with only 80% in the G3 group. For the mental health SF-36 index, the IT patients showed a significant increased level 6 months after the index procedure (IT: P = 0.02; G3: P = 0.20). The length of hospital stay was significantly (P = 0.03) shorter in the IT group. After 5 years however, neither group had significant implant-related complications or differences in terms of functional outcome.

Conclusions: Regarding functional outcome and hospital stay, the IT collective performed better in the 6-month follow-up. After 5 years, no significant differences were recorded.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

MeSH terms