Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016:2016:5710798.
doi: 10.1155/2016/5710798. Epub 2016 Mar 31.

Fluid Structural Analysis of Urine Flow in a Stented Ureter

Affiliations

Fluid Structural Analysis of Urine Flow in a Stented Ureter

J Carlos Gómez-Blanco et al. Comput Math Methods Med. 2016.

Abstract

Many urologists are currently studying new designs of ureteral stents to improve the quality of their operations and the subsequent recovery of the patient. In order to help during this design process, many computational models have been developed to simulate the behaviour of different biological tissues and provide a realistic computational environment to evaluate the stents. However, due to the high complexity of the involved tissues, they usually introduce simplifications to make these models less computationally demanding. In this study, the interaction between urine flow and a double-J stented ureter with a simplified geometry has been analysed. The Fluid-Structure Interaction (FSI) of urine and the ureteral wall was studied using three models for the solid domain: Mooney-Rivlin, Yeoh, and Ogden. The ureter was assumed to be quasi-incompressible and isotropic. Data obtained in previous studies from ex vivo and in vivo mechanical characterization of different ureters were used to fit the mentioned models. The results show that the interaction between the stented ureter and urine is negligible. Therefore, we can conclude that this type of models does not need to include the FSI and could be solved quite accurately assuming that the ureter is a rigid body and, thus, using the more simple Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) approach.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Fitting curves for flexible ureter.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Fluid domain mesh (a) and solid domain mesh (b).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Radial stresses distribution in solid domain.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Circumferential stresses distribution in solid domain.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Longitudinal stresses distribution in solid domain.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kinn A.-C., Lykkeskov-Andersen H. Impact on ureteral peristalsis in a stented ureter. An experimental study in the pig. Urological Research. 2002;30(4):213–218. doi: 10.1007/s00240-002-0258-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Venkatesh R., Landman J., Minor S. D., et al. Impact of a double-pigtail stent on ureteral peristalsis in the porcine model: initial studies using a novel implantable magnetic sensor. Journal of Endourology. 2005;19(2):170–176. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.170. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sampaio F. J. B., Pereira-Sampaio M. A., Favorito L. A. The pig kidney as an endourologic model: anatomic contribution. Journal of Endourology. 1998;12(1):45–50. doi: 10.1089/end.1998.12.45. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gijsen F. J. H., Migliavacca F., Schievano S., et al. Simulation of stent deployment in a realistic human coronary artery. BioMedical Engineering Online. 2008;7, article 23 doi: 10.1186/1475-925x-7-23. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lally C., Dolan F., Prendergast P. J. Cardiovascular stent design and vessel stresses: a finite element analysis. Journal of Biomechanics. 2005;38(8):1574–1581. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.07.022. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources