Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep;138(3):657-669.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002475.

Distraction Osteogenesis for Surgical Treatment of Craniosynostosis: A Systematic Review

Gerhard S Mundinger  1   2 , Shady A Rehim  1   2 , Owen Johnson 3rd  1   2 , Joy Zhou  1   2 , Anne Tong  1   2 , Christopher Wallner  1   2 , Amir H Dorafshar  1   2
Affiliations

Distraction Osteogenesis for Surgical Treatment of Craniosynostosis: A Systematic Review

Gerhard S Mundinger et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Distraction osteogenesis has been proposed as an alternative to cranial remodeling surgery for craniosynostosis, but technique descriptions and outcome analyses are limited to small case series. This review summarizes operative characteristics and outcomes of distraction osteogenesis and presents data comparing distraction osteogenesis to cranial remodeling surgery.

Methods: A systematic review of the literature was undertaken. Descriptive analysis, operative technical data, outcomes, or postoperative complications of distraction osteogenesis for craniosynostosis were included.

Results: A total of 1325 citations were reviewed, yielding 53 articles and 880 children who underwent distraction osteogenesis for craniosynostosis. Distraction plates were used in 754 patients (86 percent), whereas springs were used for the remaining 126 patients (14 percent). Standard and spring distraction osteogenesis was reported to successfully treat the primary condition 98 percent of the time. Suboptimal results were reported in 11 patients (1.3 percent), and minor complications were reported in 19.5 percent of cases (n = 172).Major complications were rare, occurring in 3.5 percent of cases (n = 31), and included two reported deaths. Absolute operative times and blood loss were marginally greater for cranial remodeling surgery cases, but the differences were not statistically significant.

Conclusions: Distraction osteogenesis is an effective cranial vault remodeling technique for treating craniosynostosis. No statistical differences were found with respect to operative time, blood loss, need for transfusion, or intensive care unit resources compared with cranial remodeling surgery. Outcome studies with longer follow-up periods specifically investigating cost, relapse, and reoperation rates are necessary to effectively compare this treatment modality as an alternative to cranial remodeling surgery.

Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, IV.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Serlo WS, Ylikontiola LP, Lähdesluoma N, et al. Posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis in craniosynostosis: Estimated increases in intracranial volume. Childs Nerv Syst. 2011;27:627633.
    1. Ilizarov GA, Ledyaev VI. The replacement of long tubular bone defects by lengthening distraction osteotomy of one of the fragments. 1969. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;280:710.
    1. McCarthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp N, Thorne CH, Grayson BH. Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;89:18; discussion 9.
    1. Sugawara Y, Hirabayashi S, Sakurai A, Harii K. Gradual cranial vault expansion for the treatment of craniofacial synostosis: A preliminary report. Ann Plast Surg. 1998;40:554565.
    1. Wiberg A, Magdum S, Richards PG, Jayamohan J, Wall SA, Johnson D. Posterior calvarial distraction in craniosynostosis: An evolving technique. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012;40:799806.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources