Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jul;9(3):498-509.
doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Mar 24.

Trends in colorectal cancer screening over time for persons with and without chronic disability

Lisa I Iezzoni  1 , Stephen G Kurtz  2 , Sowmya R Rao  3
Affiliations

Trends in colorectal cancer screening over time for persons with and without chronic disability

Lisa I Iezzoni et al. Disabil Health J. 2016 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Persons with disabilities have often experienced disparities in routine cancer screening. However, with civil rights protections from the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act, such disparities may diminish over time.

Objective: To examine whether disability disparities exist for colorectal cancer screening and whether these screening patterns have changed over time.

Methods: We analyzed National Health Interview Survey responses from civilian, non-institutionalized U.S. residents 50-75 years old from selected years between 1998 and 2010. We specified 7 chronic disability indicators using self-reported functional impairments, activity/participation limitations, and expected duration. Separately for women and men, we conducted bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses examining associations of self-reported colorectal cancer screening services with sociodemographic factors and disability type.

Results: Patterns of chronic disability differed somewhat between women and men; disability rates generally rose over time. For both women and men, colorectal cancer screening rates increased substantially from 1998 through 2010. Over time, relatively few statistically significant differences were reported in colorectal cancer screening rates between nondisabled persons and individuals with various disabilities. In 2010, reported screening rates were generally comparable between nondisabled and disabled persons. In the few statistically significant differences, persons with disabilities almost always reported higher colorectal cancer screening rates than nondisabled individuals.

Conclusions: According to national survey data, reported use of colorectal cancer screening is similar between nondisabled persons and individuals with a variety of different disability types. Despite physical demands of some colorectal cancer screening tests, disparities do not appear between populations with and without disability.

Keywords: Colorectal cancer screening; Disability; Disparities; Functional impairments; National Health Interview Survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no financial disclosures.

References

    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010. Second Edition, Understanding and Improving Health and Objectives for Improving Health. 2nd. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2000.
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. HealthyPeople.gov. 2020 Topics & Objectives. Disability and Health. http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/overview.aspx?top...; Accessed 21.10.15.
    1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(9):627–637. - PubMed
    1. Iezzoni LI. Eliminating health and health care disparities among the growing population of people with disabilities. Health Aff (Millwood) 2011;30(10):1947–1954. - PubMed
    1. Merten JW, Pomeranz JL, King JL, Moorhouse M, Wynn RD. Barriers to cancer screening for people with disabilities: a literature review. Disabil Health J. 2015;8(1):9–16. - PubMed

Publication types