Psychological Burden Associated With Lung Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 27130469
- PMCID: PMC5606246
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2016.03.007
Psychological Burden Associated With Lung Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose radiation computed tomography (LDCT) reduces mortality and is recommended for high-risk current and former smokers. Several potential harms associated with LCS have been identified, including the potential for psychological burden. To summarize the current state of the scientific knowledge on psychological burden associated with LCS, we performed a systematic search of the contemporary quantitative and qualitative research literature. We included randomized controlled trials and cohort studies that evaluated the effect of LCS with LDCT on psychological burden and health-related quality of life assessed using validated and nonvalidated measures. PubMed, CINAHL, PsychINFO, and Scopus were searched for English language articles published between 2004 and January 2015. Data abstraction and quality assessment were conducted by 2 independent reviewers. Thirteen studies were included that met our inclusion criteria. Overall, results were variable with some studies reporting worse psychological burden for patients with indeterminate results at prescreening, after screening, and at short-term follow-up (<6 months after screen). These adverse effects diminished or resolved at long-term follow-up (> 6 months after screen). LCS might be associated with short-term adverse psychological burden, particularly after a false positive result. However, these adverse effects diminished over time. The amount of current evidence is small, with limitations in study design and use of outcome measures. More high-quality research is needed to determine the frequency, duration, and overall magnitude of LCS-related psychological burden in nonclinical trial settings.
Keywords: Anxiety; Health-related quality of life; Low-dose computed tomography; Psychological distress; Shared decision-making.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
References
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC WONDER On-line Database. Vol Series 20. National Center for Health Statistics; 2013. No. 2P.
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2015 Jan;65(1):5–29. - PubMed
-
- Howlader NNA, Krapcho M, Garshell J, Miller D, Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Mariotto A, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2011. National Cancer Institute; http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2011/
-
- Henschke CI International Early Lung Cancer Action Program I. Survival of patients with clinical stage I lung cancer diagnosed by computed tomography screening for lung cancer. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2007 Sep 1;13(17):4949–4950. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
