Racial Differences in Quantitative Measures of Area and Volumetric Breast Density
- PMID: 27130893
- PMCID: PMC5939658
- DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djw104
Racial Differences in Quantitative Measures of Area and Volumetric Breast Density
Abstract
Background: Increased breast density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer and also decreases the sensitivity of mammographic screening. The purpose of our study was to compare breast density for black and white women using quantitative measures.
Methods: Breast density was assessed among 5282 black and 4216 white women screened using digital mammography. Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) density was obtained from radiologists' reports. Quantitative measures for dense area, area percent density (PD), dense volume, and volume percent density were estimated using validated, automated software. Breast density was categorized as dense or nondense based on BI-RADS categories or based on values above and below the median for quantitative measures. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of having dense breasts by race, adjusted for age, body mass index (BMI), age at menarche, menopause status, family history of breast or ovarian cancer, parity and age at first birth, and current hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use. All statistical tests were two-sided.
Results: There was a statistically significant interaction of race and BMI on breast density. After accounting for age, BMI, and breast cancer risk factors, black women had statistically significantly greater odds of high breast density across all quantitative measures (eg, PD nonobese odds ratio [OR] = 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.02 to 1.37, P = .03, PD obese OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.53, P = .02). There was no statistically significant difference in BI-RADS density by race.
Conclusions: After accounting for age, BMI, and other risk factors, black women had higher breast density than white women across all quantitative measures previously associated with breast cancer risk. These results may have implications for risk assessment and screening.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Figures
Comment in
-
Breast Density: More Than Meets the Eye.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Apr 29;108(10):djw128. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw128. Print 2016 Oct. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016. PMID: 27130894 No abstract available.
References
-
- Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ , et al. . Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer . N Engl J Med. 2007. ; 356 ( 3 ): 227 – 236 . - PubMed
-
- Vacek PM, Geller BM. A prospective study of breast cancer risk using routine mammographic breast density measurements . Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev . 2004. ; 13 ( 5 ): 715 – 722 . - PubMed
-
- Harvey JA, Bovbjerg VE. Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk . Radiology. 2004. ; 230 ( 1 ): 29 – 41 . - PubMed
-
- Vachon CM, Brandt KR, Ghosh K , et al. . Mammographic breast density as a general marker of breast cancer risk . Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007. ; 16 ( 1 ): 43 – 49 . - PubMed
-
- McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis . Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006. ; 15 ( 6 ): 1159 – 1169 . - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
