Effect of Ownership on Hospice Service Use: 2005-2011
- PMID: 27131344
- PMCID: PMC4882235
- DOI: 10.1111/jgs.14093
Effect of Ownership on Hospice Service Use: 2005-2011
Abstract
Objectives: To assess differences in populations and service use according to hospice ownership, chain status, and agency size.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: United States.
Participants: Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 and older enrolled in hospice during 2005 to 2011 N = 5,405,526).
Measurements: Hospice use according to ownership category (for-profit nonchain and chain, not-for-profit nonchain and chain, government) and agency size (0-50, 51-200, 201-400, ≥401 individuals discharged each year). Mean length of use, stays of 3 days or fewer, stays ending with live discharge, and decedents receiving no general inpatient care (GIP)- or continuous home care (CHC)-level hospice in the last 7 days of life.
Results: After adjusting for individual and geographic differences, for-profit nonchain and chain agencies had longer mean length of use (84.5 and 91.2 days, respectively) than other agency types (66.3-72.5 days), higher rates of live discharge (21.0% and 20.2% vs 14.6-15.9%), and lower proportions of stays of 3 days or fewer (13.9% and 14.7% vs 16.6-17.5%) (all P < .001). The proportion of decedents not receiving GIP- or CHC-level care before death was highest in for-profit chains (75.9%) and lowest in not-for-profit nonchains (63.2%). Smaller agencies had longer mean length of use, higher live discharge rates, lower rates of stays of 3 days or fewer, and higher rates of individuals receiving no GIP- or CHC-level care. There were considerable differences in patient traits and unadjusted service use between the nation's largest chains.
Conclusion: In addition to for-profit and not-for-profit hospice agencies differing according to important dimensions, there is substantial heterogeneity within these ownership categories, highlighting the need to consider factors such as agency size and chain affiliation in understanding variations in Medicare beneficiaries' hospice care.
Keywords: Medicare; hospice; ownership; profit; quality.
© 2016, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2016, The American Geriatrics Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures

Similar articles
-
Evolution of the home health care market: The expansion and quality performance of multi-agency chains.Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec;55 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):1073-1084. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13597. Health Serv Res. 2020. PMID: 33284527 Free PMC article.
-
Association of hospice agency profit status with patient diagnosis, location of care, and length of stay.JAMA. 2011 Feb 2;305(5):472-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.70. JAMA. 2011. PMID: 21285424 Free PMC article.
-
National hospice survey results: for-profit status, community engagement, and service.JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Apr;174(4):500-6. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3. JAMA Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24567076 Free PMC article.
-
Characteristics of Hospice Programs With Problematic Live Discharges.J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Oct;50(4):548-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.05.001. Epub 2015 May 21. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015. PMID: 26004403
-
Live Discharge From Hospice: A Systematic Review.J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2019 Dec;21(6):482-488. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000547. J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2019. PMID: 30964834
Cited by
-
Medicare Hospice Policy Changes and Beneficiaries' Rate of Live Discharge and Length-of-Stay.J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Mar;65(3):162-172. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.12.001. Epub 2022 Dec 13. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023. PMID: 36526252 Free PMC article.
-
Market segmentation by profit status: evidence from hospice.Health Aff Sch. 2024 Nov 29;2(12):qxae160. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae160. eCollection 2024 Dec. Health Aff Sch. 2024. PMID: 39677001 Free PMC article.
-
Evolution of the home health care market: The expansion and quality performance of multi-agency chains.Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec;55 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):1073-1084. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13597. Health Serv Res. 2020. PMID: 33284527 Free PMC article.
-
Transitions from Home Health to Hospice: The Role of Agency Affiliation.J Palliat Med. 2022 Jun;25(6):873-879. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0390. Epub 2021 Dec 29. J Palliat Med. 2022. PMID: 34964665 Free PMC article.
-
Hospice Composition Based on Diagnosis is Associated with Caregiver-Reported Quality Measures.Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 Dec;39(12):1410-1417. doi: 10.1177/10499091221088497. Epub 2022 Apr 20. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022. PMID: 35442840 Free PMC article.
References
-
- IOM (Institute of Medicine) Dying in America: Improving quality and honoring individual preferences near the end of life. Washington, D.C: The National Academies Press; 2014. - PubMed
-
- MedPAC. Hospice Services. Report to the Congress: Medicare Payment Policy (March 2014) Washington, D.C: The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission; 2014. pp. 299–320.
-
- Span P. The New Old Age: Caring and Coping [Internet] [Accessed October 12, 2014];New York Times. 2014 Oct 6; Available at: http://newoldage.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/10/06/extra-scrutiny-for-hospices/
-
- Lindrooth RC, Weisbrod BA. Do religious nonprofit and for-profit organizations respond differently to financial incentives? The hospice industry. J Health Econ. 2007;26:342–357. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical