Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jul;9(2):240-4.
doi: 10.1007/s12194-016-0355-4. Epub 2016 Apr 30.

Evaluation of the usefulness of modified biological fingerprints in chest radiographs for patient recognition and identification

Affiliations

Evaluation of the usefulness of modified biological fingerprints in chest radiographs for patient recognition and identification

Yoichiro Shimizu et al. Radiol Phys Technol. 2016 Jul.

Abstract

We have been developing an image-searching method to identify misfiled images in a PACS server. Developing new biological fingerprints (BFs) that would reduce the influence of differences in positioning and breathing phases to improve the performance of recognition is desirable. In our previous studies, the whole lung field (WLF) that included the shadows of the body and lungs was affected by differences in positioning and/or breathing phases. In this study, we showed the usefulness of a circumscribed lung with a rectangular region of interest and the upper half of a chest radiograph as modified BFs. We used 200 images as hypothetically misfiled images. The cross-correlation identifies the resemblance between the BFs in the misfiled images and the corresponding BFs in the database images. The modified BFs indicated better results than did WLF in a receiver operating characteristic analysis; therefore, they could be used as identifiers for patient recognition and identification.

Keywords: Biological fingerprints; Digital chest radiograph; Patient identification; Picture archiving and communication system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Radiol Phys Technol. 2011 Jan;4(1):84-90 - PubMed
    1. Med Phys. 1995 May;22(5):617-26 - PubMed
    1. Acad Radiol. 2004 Mar;11(3):309-15 - PubMed
    1. Acad Radiol. 2013 Aug;20(8):1024-31 - PubMed
    1. Acad Radiol. 2005 Jan;12(1):97-103 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources