Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 May;31(5):660-73.
doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.5.660. Epub 2016 Feb 23.

Specialist Bibliographic Databases

Affiliations
Review

Specialist Bibliographic Databases

Armen Yuri Gasparyan et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2016 May.

Abstract

Specialist bibliographic databases offer essential online tools for researchers and authors who work on specific subjects and perform comprehensive and systematic syntheses of evidence. This article presents examples of the established specialist databases, which may be of interest to those engaged in multidisciplinary science communication. Access to most specialist databases is through subscription schemes and membership in professional associations. Several aggregators of information and database vendors, such as EBSCOhost and ProQuest, facilitate advanced searches supported by specialist keyword thesauri. Searches of items through specialist databases are complementary to those through multidisciplinary research platforms, such as PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Familiarizing with the functional characteristics of biomedical and nonbiomedical bibliographic search tools is mandatory for researchers, authors, editors, and publishers. The database users are offered updates of the indexed journal lists, abstracts, author profiles, and links to other metadata. Editors and publishers may find particularly useful source selection criteria and apply for coverage of their peer-reviewed journals and grey literature sources. These criteria are aimed at accepting relevant sources with established editorial policies and quality controls.

Keywords: Abstracting and Indexing as Topic; Bibliographic Databases; Editorial Policies; Information Retrieval; Periodicals as Topic; Publishing; Systematic Reviews.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

DISCLOSURE: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gasparyan AY, Yessirkepov M, Voronov AA, Gerasimov AN, Kostyukova EI, Kitas GD. Preserving the integrity of citations and references by all stakeholders of science communication. J Korean Med Sci. 2015;30:1545–1552. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rathbone J, Carter M, Hoffmann T, Glasziou P. Better duplicate detection for systematic reviewers: evaluation of systematic review assistant-deduplication module. Syst Rev. 2015;4:6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Niel G, Boyrie F, Virieux D. Chemical bibliographic databases: The influence of term indexing policies on topic searches. New J Chem. 2015;39:8807–8817.
    1. Ellegaard O, Wallin JA. Identification of environmentally relevant chemicals in bibliographic databases: a comparative analysis. Springerplus. 2013;2:255. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cavacini A. What is the best database for computer science journal articles? Scientometrics. 2015;102:2059–2071.