Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar;10(3):EC11-5.
doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/16339.7433. Epub 2016 Mar 1.

Evaluation of Renal Allograft Biopsies for Graft Dysfunction and Relevance of C4d Staining in Antibody Mediated Rejection

Affiliations

Evaluation of Renal Allograft Biopsies for Graft Dysfunction and Relevance of C4d Staining in Antibody Mediated Rejection

Clement Wilfred Devadass et al. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Mar.

Abstract

Introduction: Biopsy remains gold standard for diagnosis of Graft Dysfunction (GD). It guides clinical management, provides valuable insights into pathogenesis of early and late allograft injury and is indispensable for distinguishing rejection from non- rejection causes of GD.

Aim: The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the diverse histomorphological lesions in renal allograft biopsy (RAB). Further, we determined the frequency of peritubular capillary (PTC) C4d positivity and its correlation with microvascular inflammation in Antibody Mediated Rejection (AMR).

Materials and methods: This was a prospective study on RAB over a period of 2 months. Histopathological evaluation was undertaken as per revised Banff'13 schema. Immunohistochemistry was performed to detect PTC C4d deposition.

Results: Sixty five diagnostic biopsies were evaluated. Mean patient age was 34 years and males were predominant. The time interval between graft biopsy and transplantation ranged from 5 days to 8 years, with 52.3% biopsies belonging to period of ≤ 6 months post-transplant. Immune injuries were observed in 40 biopsies out of which AMR was observed in 35 biopsies. Calcineurin inhibitor toxicity (CNI Toxicity) was the second commonest cause observed in 12 biopsies and other lesions including de novo glomerulopathies were observed in the remaining biopsies. The sensitivity of C4d in detecting acute AMR was 55% and chronic AMR was 23.5.

Conclusion: AMR and CNI Toxicity account for majority of graft dysfunction. C4d is not as sensitive a marker of AMR, as was initially thought. Higher proportion of moderate microvascular inflammation is found in diffuse C4d positive cases compared to focal C4d positive cases.

Keywords: CNI Toxicity; Peritubular capillary C4d deposition; Renal biopsy; Renal transplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

[Table/Fig-1]:
[Table/Fig-1]:
Timing of allograft biopsies post transplantation. x axis indicates time of biopsy, y indicates No. of cases..
[Table/Fig-3]:
[Table/Fig-3]:
Types of rejection with or without superimposed non-rejection causes. ABMR- Antibody mediated rejection, Others- non-rejection causes, TCMR- T-cell-mediated rejection. The 2 cases of borderline rejection were amenable to steroid therapy and hence were considered to be earliest evidence of immunological activity.
[Table/Fig-8]:
[Table/Fig-8]:
(A) AMR with moderate transplant glomerulitis (long arrow) and moderate peritubular capillaritis (short arrow) PAS X 200. (B) C4d immunohistochemistry with diffuse peritubular capillary deposits of C4d (Score: C4d3) (arrow) X200.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aryal G, Shah DS. Histopathological evaluation of renal allograft biopsies in Nepal: interpretation and significance. Journal of Pathology of Nepal. 2012;2:172–79.
    1. D’Agati VD, Jennette JC, Silva FG. Non-neoplastic kidney diseases. Washington DC: American Registry of Pathology/Armed Force Institute of Pathology; 2005. In Pathology of renal transplantation in: Donald WK, ed; pp. 667–709.
    1. Nickeleit V, Mengel M, Colvin RB. In: Hepinstall’s Pathology of the Kidney. 7th ed. Vol. 2. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014. Renal Transplant Pathology, Chapter 29; pp. 1321–1431. Jennette JC, Olson JL, Silva FG, D’ Agati VD, Eds.
    1. Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB, et al. The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int. 1999;I55:713–23. - PubMed
    1. Sis B, Mengel M, Haas M, et al. Banff ‘09 meeting report: antibody mediated graft deterioration and implementation of Banff working groups. Am J Transplant. 2010;10:464–71. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources